(Additional
info to the below email sent earlier -- probably crucial to our health and
staying alive - scroll to end)
|
Friends, (This needs to be sent to Talk Radio and TV hosts! As well as widest dissemination to your friends!)
Today,
We want to learn more about this declaration. Exact legal terminology and wording is very important.
A "H1N1 National Emergency" should be, repeat, should be limited to medical activities, such as the President's ability to mandate forced vaccinations to every citizen.
But if it's a general "national
emergency" (based on a pandemic or other reason), it opens the
door for all kinds of EO's (Executive Orders)
to be signed and implemented, including forced vaccinations, martial law, and
implementation of his other Marxist-fascist agenda. Wording of this
declaration is THE "key" to do all these things. A
"general" declaration would or could include declaration
of martial law, suspension of Constitution, suspension of writ of habeas
corpus (no more trials by jury, no need to read Miranda rights, citizens can
go to jail without cause, citizens can be force quarantined for not taking
the swine flu vaccination, quarantine could include quarantine in
your own home or in internment camps, etc).
I suspected this EO was in the mill, which
could be based on the "birth certificate" court case that
may be getting too close or other reason. Also, because so many dems in Congress are not agreeing with Obamacare, so many media outlets came to FOX's defense this past week against Obama's attacks on FOX, so many dems
in Congress not agreeing to a second "stimulus" (bankruptcy)
package -- Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod's "handlers" in the New World Order may
have given the order to make the "national emergency" declaration
today. This is just a "heads up" to those who didn't
learn of this news. I would appreciate learning and receiving anyone else's
"news" and commentaries on this subject. Why is this so important? This one event could
very well be the beginning of the end of the United States
of America, our Constitution, abandonment of the Constitution,
abandonment of the Bill of Rights, and so many other things we enjoy and take
for granted -- the beginnings of a police state like China, former
Soviet Union, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, Vietnam, etc. (Denial of
the possibility of these things is unhelpful to anyone.) I think it's interesting that he did this on a
Saturday, not a weekday working day when objections and other commentaries
could be offered or objections stated -- or when representatives could be
questioned. Based on the number of deaths so far, H1N1 doesn't seem to
be at the true pandemic level, nor have the number of deaths even reached
normal flu season deaths. The swine flu "pandemic" is (IMHO)
another fabricated crisis, just like the "bailouts" were based
on "crisis, crisis, crisis" that were non-existent. This
Marxist-fascist administration is using the term "crisis" in
lieu of the word "revolution" that traditional
Marxist-fascist-Communists use to force their agenda. Everything in
this administration is done by "force" not freedom. Not
merely Watch your back! Be careful about opening your
front door to a gang of armed people, one or two in white lab coats with
serial numbered vaccines! Getting a medical statement that it would be
hazardous to your health to accept the H1N1 vaccination, or a religious
statement, or having documentation of a previous neurological disorder are
the only three ways I know of that anyone can refuse to take a forced
vaccination. Not taking the vaccination under a declared "national
emergency" is tantamount to agreeing to be arrested and/or quarantined --
the ongoing stated reasons are "for the protection of the rest of
the population". Secretary of Homeland Security is likely sending
out orders to agents and field offices all over the nation and world for
their actions in response to this executive order. Another option is to willingly take the H1N1
vaccination and risk dying of it a few months later. One
endocrinologist said in a FOX debate that this vaccine has 25,000 more
neurotoxins than normal flu vaccines. This is similar to the Anthrax
vaccination given to military for the Gulf War that killed over 85,000
U.S. military AFTER the war by Gulf War Syndrome (over 200,000 when
Canadian, Aussie and Brit troop deaths are included) -- all related
to the anthrax vaccination. GHWB ordered the Anthrax vaccine to be
given to the military. I'll go to my grave believing GHWB and
his N.W.O. string pullers are mass
murderers! Taking the vaccination is your choice. The next few days and weeks should be very
interesting! Possibly very dangerous to conservative citizens! If
anyone can video tape armed people at your front door, please share such
videos to the world! (Obama has his reasons
for wanting to shut down the internet and FOX. Now, with a national
emergency being declared, he can shut down any media or internet he
pleases. Please get this word out while we still can!) Ron White
The Vaccine Industry, CDC, AMA, and FDA continually defends mercury as "safe":
"It's not that bad, really. What's a little mercury in your shot anyway? Ignore these inconvenient facts: A typical flu vaccine shot solution is 50,000 parts per billion of mercury. The EPA classifies any substance with more than 200 parts per billion as hazardous waste. (The EPA limit in drinking water is 2 parts per billion.) Thus, the mercury density in a vaccine is 25,000% higher than the level required to be considered hazardous waste. This is injected directly into the bloodstream of infants, children, expectant mothers and senior citizens. What could possibly be dangerous about that?" http://www.naturalnews.com/027293_flu_vaccine_swine.html NOTE: MERCURY is the most toxic element second only to radioactive Plutonium. Then there is all of the other toxic components in all vaccines, including ALUMINUM which is consistently shown in studies to exist in high levels in Autism and Alzheimers along with MERCURY. [Note: My grandson who immediately developed regressive Autism after his last batch of vaccines, has aluminum levels off the charts at 1,160, with 100 being normal level for an adult!!!] And then there is the SQUALENE in the Swine Flu vaccines--Please read the following Motion for Injunction filed in Federal Court for the FACTS regarding the extreme dangers of the Swine Flu Vaccines, Squalene being only one of many: 14. "Now add to that the fact that records show that the “Pandemic Influenza” vaccine formulations that include added squalene may contain a million times more of the damaging lipid squalene than the source of Gulf War Syndrome, Vaccine A, and you have a nightmare scenario which simply must not be allowed to take place." [From Motion for Injunction, See Below] 7. Inoculation with any live-virus vaccine is, in and of itself, clearly associated with higher levels of mortality and morbidity. [From Motion for Injunction, See Below]
The Swine Flu Vaccine contains THREE LIVE VIRUS components: Swine Flu, Bird Flu, and Human H1N1-A, which has not been sufficiently tested, and will be injected into millions of human guinea pigs who have no clue as to the extreme dangers to their health and life. Mercury + Aluminum + Squalene + Triple Live Virus = Disaster If your health and your life are important to you read the following: Motion for Injunction
Gary Null, Rima Laibow et al., PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiffs, through undersigned counsel, hereby move this United States District Court for the District of Columbia to issue a preliminary injunction, or, if no preliminary injunction hearing can be held on or before the 21st day of October 2009, a temporary restraining order pending such hearing requiring the Defendants in their official capacities or as agents of the United States to withdraw or suspend the four 2009-H1N1-A Influenza Vaccine license modification approvals of September 15, 2009, whereby the Defendants approved certain vaccines which have been or will be purchased by Federal government agencies for distribution to the public, including the individual Plaintiffs herein, who stand in imminent peril of irreparable harm, having been mandated by regulation to receive the vaccines upon Defendants’ approval, or suffer penalties imposed by regulation, upon the facts set forth in the Complaint and supporting Certifications herein and for the reasons set forth in the Brief in Support of the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. See Exhibit “A” attached to this motion and incorporated herein by this reference. Plaintiffs further request, pursuant to Local Rule
65.1(d) a preliminary injunction hearing within twenty days of the filing of
this motion because of the emergent nature of the probable harm. As more
fully set forth in the moving papers, based on the best information currently
available to Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs believe that a hearing will be required
on or before The reasons supporting this motion, and the facts that particularly justify immediate judicial action to preserve valuable rights, as set forth below, are more fully developed in the accompanying Plaintiffs’ Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Complaint and Certifications in support thereof. 1. The Defendants’ decision to issue the aforesaid licenses, modified licenses or approvals is arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law, and there is a substantial likelihood that Plaintiffs will succeed on the merits of this action. Specifically, the approvals violate the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (FDCA) and other statutes cited in Plaintiffs’ Brief, the Defendant Agencies’ implementing regulations and the Administrative Procedures Act show the following. 2. There is significant scientific agreement among independent scientists that the foreseeable risk of a vaccine’s potential to cause harm cannot be determined without adequate testing and that this is especially true regarding the 2009-H1N1-A Virus which has been arbitrarily and capriciously declared to be in a state of pandemic emergency. Further, Defendants have published a plan on their web sites to adulterate the approved vaccines with an unapproved “oil in water” adjuvant (squalene, a squalene derivative, and/or a squalene/GP120 mixture along with other as yet undisclosed and unlabeled components). 3. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has never heretofore approved these “oil in water” adjuvant components for inclusion in vaccines licensed for general human use in the United States and, indeed, Defendant Sebelius testified before a Congressional committee on September 15, 2009 that the Defendant Agency’s own scientists do not want “to go down that road.” Nonetheless, the Defendants have purchased over $484 million dollars worth of squalene and adjuvant and have a published plan to adulterate the approved vaccines with it. Moreover, the majority of the doses of these novel “Swine Flu” A/HINl influenza vaccines contain other toxins such as mercury (in the form of Thimerosal) and may also, based on some news releases, include nanoparticles also never approved for human use. 4. There is significant scientific agreement that there has been either inadequate or no definitive safety testing of the vaccines and those components of the vaccines that are highly toxic and require specific toxicity testing to prove their safety for use in a vaccine, such as Thimerosal when used as a preservative, and the “oil in water” adjuvants for which independent toxicological safety testing to established standards is required by law � (21 CFR § 6l0.15(a). 5. Based on the low level of danger of the novel 2009-H1N1-A “Swine Flu” virus that has been observed so far and the probable high level of risk from the unapproved adjuvant squalene and the certainty of the presence of another highly toxic ingredient, Thimerosal, it is likely that the purported benefits cannot outweigh the foreseeable risks. 6. At least one of the approved vaccines is a “cold adapted” (genetically modified), live A/H1N1 virus, flu vaccine. This category of vaccine is more dangerous than other kinds. This is the first of the four vaccines the government is providing to the public. 7. Inoculation with any live-virus vaccine is, in and of itself, clearly associated with higher levels of mortality and morbidity (as well as with risks for secondary transmission and disease spread) than injections of the other types of vaccines (e.g., inactivated-virus, bacterial component, and viral component), even absent. squalene and other toxic adjuvants and preservatives. 8. In addition, there is concern that no large-scale
review of post-vaccination effectiveness has, to date, demonstrated that any
influenza vaccines are effective in preventing those inoculated with them
from contracting influenza. One of these large-scale review studies was co-authored
by Plaintiffs’ expert, Dr. Paul G. King, PhD, analytical chemist and is the
only 20-plus-year study (1979 -2001) of in-use effectiveness of influenza
vaccination in the 9. A comparison of the under 600 deaths in the United States that have been attributed to A/H1N1, compared to the CDC’s estimate of an annual 36,000 seasonal influenza-related deaths in the United States and the lack of any reported significant increase in influenza. 10. At least two of the approved vaccines in question may
include added “oil in water” adjuvants including squalene, which has never been approved for
drug use in humans in the 11. The FDA knows full well that the “Pandemic Influenza” Vaccines, containing mercury and/or other problematic components (to which the autoimmune toxin squalene may be added), do not work and are less than safe. In fact, the government has acknowledged that the vaccines, before the addition of squalene and other adjuvants, may well maim and kill 30,000 or more Americans, mainly, according to their statements, children and pregnant women! 12. The Defendants say that these vaccines will be accepted if they create some level of antibodies (which “may be associated with” protection, but which may not be so associated) in 4 out of 10 recipients with at least 70 percent of those 4 (4 x 0.7 = 2.8 people per 10!) achieving an antibody level that is believed (but there is no certainty in this belief) to provide a protection to those who are subsequently exposed to the novel influenza virus. 13. Even accepting the unproven hypothesis of “herd immunity” or, more accurately, “herd protection”, an immune response in 28% of the “herd” does not quality for herd protection by a factor of 3 since herd protection is general1y considered to have been achieved if at least 85% of the herd is assured of being protected, not the absurd 28% acceptable to the FDA in this instance. This means that an acceptable vaccine candidate would provide possible “protection” for 28% of vaccine recipients or less than 3 out of 10 recipients; moreover the FDA’s acceptance “standard” drops to 18% efficacy for those over 65 years of age (60% of 30%). 14. Now add to that the fact that public records show that the “Pandemic Influenza” vaccine formulations that include added squalene may contain a million times more of the damaging lipid squalene than the source of Gulf War Syndrome, Vaccine A, and you have a nightmare scenario which simply must not be allowed to take place. 15. Finally, inoculation with the live viruses in the “nasal mist vaccine”, which is to be the first one released for use, will convert all those inoculated into shedders of a live novel A/H1N1 virus that may infect others. 16. Absent a preliminary injunction or temporary
restraining order, the public health will suffer as untold numbers of the
patients and/or health care clients of the Plaintiffs will be exposed to
dangerous vaccine toxins and similar trespasses leading to a significant risk
of medication errors and patient harm. There is no valid pandemic
emergency, declared or otherwise, that would justify the Defendants decision
or that would justify judicial inaction in the face of what the Supreme Court
in Jacobson v Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905) that the judiciary is
“competent to interfere and protect the health and life of the individual
concerned. ” The harm which Plaintiffs will suffer is further
irreparable since money damages may not be had against the Defendants
(having protected themselves from any liability through a claimed “Pandemic
Emergency Declaration” of 17. The issuance of an injunction will not substantially injure Defendants, since, among other considerations, Defendant Agencies have the statutory duty to protect the public from drugs which have not been properly safety tested, as more fully set forth in Dr. Paul King’s Certification. 18. Lastly, it is in the public interest to issue an injunction because the Defendants’ decision places the public health at risk and places these Plaintiffs personally at risk of adverse consequences as a direct result of that decision. The courts must be especially vigilant to prevent the Defendants from repeating the same mistake their predecessors made with the 1976 Swine Flu Vaccination, which cost hundreds of lives and left thousands maimed for life. 19. As attested in the accompanying Certificate of Counsel pursuant to Local Rule 65.1(a), Counsel for Plaintiffs has informed the Department of Justice of the United States of America, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW � Washington, DC 20530-0001 of Plaintiffs’ intention to seek a temporary restraining order in the alternative in this matter and the time of the making of this application and has provided said counsel with copies of Plaintiffs’ Complaint for Declaratory, Injunctive or other relief, this motion and all supporting Certification and papers, including the accompanying proposed order. 20. The facts in this case make an expedited preliminary
injunction hearing essential due to the imminent spread of the 2009-H1N1-A
“pandemic influenza” virus by the licensed vaccinations, and specifically the
“live virus” nasal mist vaccine, the first of the four approved vaccines
being distributed under the control of the government to the public, as more
fully explained in the moving papers. Accordingly, Plaintiffs seek a hearing
on Plaintiffs motion on or before 21. If the motion for preliminary injunction cannot be heard and adjudicated on or before October 30, 2009, Plaintiffs respectfully request a temporary restraining order not to exceed the period allowed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b)(2), requiring Defendants to withdraw or suspend its decision approving the vaccines, or, requiring that all such vaccines be given only to persons who have been fully and truthfully informed of all the risks associated with these vaccines and who, after having been fully and truthfully informed of aforesaid risks, have given their fully informed voluntary written consent for the administration of these vaccines to themselves or their children or others for whom they are responsible. Dated: BREIF IN SUPPORT OF INJUNCTION [Federal Court] http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=3624 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF [Federal Court] http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=3619 |