|
TIMELINE OF EVENTS IN PROPOSED PORTS DEAL
- Related Stories
Sale of port operations could affect the Port of N.H.
Despite Delay, Bush Has Final Say On Ports Deal
UAE helped with Katrina cash
Republicans against Bush's role in ports deal
Warnings of 'intelligence gaps' before port deal
- Arab Americans see bigotry behind
ports uproar
Port sale fuels terrorism fears
Arab Company Taking Over Philly's Port
Business deal raises safety concerns
British Court OKs Dubai Company Takeover
Volcano is on the rise at Yellowstone park
(This will probably be next to get our minds
off the ports)
MSN - Feb. 26, 2006 - A timeline of events in DP World's proposed
$6.8 billion takeover of major operations at six U.S. ports:
Oct. 17, 2005 _ Representatives of DP World approach Treasury
officials about its plans to purchase the British firm, Peninsular
and Oriental Steam Navigation Co., that controls major operations
at six U.S. Nov. 2 _ Homeland Security Department asks U.S. intelligence
agencies for information on DP World; they produce nothing "derogatory,"
according to DHS officials.
Dec. 6 _ Staff from all agencies who sit on U.S. Committee
on Foreign Investment (CFIUS) meet with company officials to
review transaction.
Dec. 16 _ Company files formal notice of deal with Treasury,
which circulates the filing to all CFIUS departments and agencies,
as well as the departments of Energy and Transportation.
Jan. 17, 2006 _ CFIUS does not object to the transaction after
a 30-day review in which Homeland Security gets DP World to agree
to open its books and keep the current U.S. ports management
intact.
Feb. 11 _ The Associated Press reports the deal, including
Dubai's ties to Sept. 11 terrorists.
Week of Feb. 13 _ Lawmakers from both parties, including Democratic
Sen. Charles Schumer and GOP Rep. John Sweeney, call on Treasury
Secretary John Snow and Homeland Secretary Michael Chertoff to
explain the deal publicly.
Feb. 16 _ Aides inform President Bush of controversy and that
administration had approved the deal a month earlier.
Feb. 20 _ Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist says he will introduce
legislation to delay the transaction if the White House doesn't
do so.
Feb. 21 _ Bush defends the deal, saying it "will not
jeopardize the security of the country," and he vows to
veto any congressional effort to stop it.
Feb. 23 _ Senate Armed Services Committee holds hearing; Democrats
charge Bush administration violated law by not conducting an
additional 45-day security review and fully informing Congress.
DP World later suggests it will delay the transaction to give
lawmakers time to be briefed fully.
- Feb. 26 _ DP World agrees to a 45-day review and promises
to create a U.S. subsidiary that would operate independently
of executives in Dubai until May.
- http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11577657/from/RL.1/
-
- BUSH SAYS HE REMAINS SUPPORTIVE OF PORTS DEAL
Lawmakers upset by revelation Coast Guard had concerns about
Dubai firm
Feb. 28: Lawmakers held hearings on the controversial deal to
turn over operations at six major American ports to a state-owned
company based in the United Arab Emirates. NBC's Chip Reid reports.
WCAU-TV - WASHINGTON - Homeland Security Director Michael Chertoff
on Sunday defended the government's security review of an Arab
company given permission to take over operations at six major
U.S. ports. ..
- Critics have cited the UAE's history as an operational and
financial base for the hijackers who carried out the attacks
of Sept. 11, 2001. ..
- In addition, they contend the UAE was an important transfer
point for shipments of smuggled nuclear components sent to Iran,
North Korea and Libya by a Pakistani scientist. ..
- London court OKs Dubai Ports purchase
Acquisition of London-based company fuels U.S. ports controversy
- March 2, 2006 - LONDON - Britains High Court approved
the takeover of British shipping icon Peninsular and Oriental
Steam Navigation Co. by state-owned Dubai Ports World on Thursday,
despite a last-minute objection by a U.S. company. Justice Nicholas
Warren dismissed the appeal from Miami-based Eller & Co.
as he gave the required go-ahead for the $6.8 billion deal. Eller
had argued that U.S. concerns about a United Arab Emirates company
owning significant operations at six major U.S. seaports could
substantially harm its business. The objections of Eller
do not persuade me that I should not sanction the acquisition,
Warren said. Eller had argued that U.S. concerns about a United
Arab Emirates company owning significant operations at six major
U.S. seaports could substantially harm its business. The proposed
deal has caused consternation among some lawmakers and businesses
in the United States. The judge said he took into account U.S.
concerns. I have been treated to a large amount of evidence
on press releases and articles which were no doubt being spun
to this direction or that, Warren said.... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11639040/
|