|
As I speak
tonight, try to relate what I say to your observation of our
own country, and our Western (once Christian) allies. As we examine
the philosophy behind national and international affairs, we
discover it has a common purpose and source in every major nation,
with the exception of perhaps China.
At first sight, militant national power appears to be the major
force in history; but if there is a power which can bring nations
into military conflict, it is a superior power. Is there such
a power, and where, if anywhere, is it located?
There is a relationship between Finance, Centralization, and
World Hegemony. Until the outbreak of the First World War,
money appeared to be a mere mechanism. But the arrangements made
to finance the war reveal that the money system was in fact the
vehicle of a POLICY, and that that policy was the CENTRALIZATION
of power leading progressively to World Government. Prior to
the outbreak of war, Great Britain was the CENTRE (but
not the BEING) of world financial control; with the war,
financial control was transferred to New York and from there
used to dismantle the British Empire which, by reason of British
traditions and the Anglo-Saxon character, had been the great
barrier to World Dominion by those operating through the world
financial system. The fall of the British Empire was a FINANCIAL
accomplishment, not a military one. But the terms of 'peace'
imposed on 'victorious' Britain are those which might have been
expected following military DEFEAT.
But the Power which emerged into the open in this century had
its birth long before that. It was incubated (but not conceived)
in the Secret Societies of Europe, appeared briefly in the French
Revolution, and spread to Britain in the form of Fabianism, and
to America in the form of various Socialist societies. Following
the first phase of the war, it openly took over Russia, and since
has visibly spread as International Communism until it has taken
over the greater part of the globe.
Current history, which looks episodic, is in fact the culminating
stages of a very long-term policy moving internationally, but
visible only in the long perspective of time.
What we think we see is often an illusion intentionally presented,
like the conjuror who would have you to believe he holds an orange
in his right hand, when it is actually in his left hand. Citizens
of the world, whether their sympathies are left-wing or right-wing,
monarchist or republican, have been used as pawns in their game
of Hegelian psychology by the hidden hand that rules.
In reality, the orange is in neither left nor right hand. The
Hegelian dialectic process is the notion that conflict creates
history. (See brain2.htm
"Brainwash").
From this axiom it follows that controlled conflict can create
a predetermined history. For example when the Trilateral Commission
discusses 'managed conflict', as it does extensively in
its literature, it implies the managed use of conflict for long
run predetermined ends - not for the mere random exercise of
manipulative control to solve a problem.
The dialectic takes this Trilateral 'managed conflict' process
one step further. In Hegelian terms, an existing force (the thesis)
generates a counterforce (the antithesis). Conflict between
the two forces results in the forming of a synthesis.
Then the process starts all over again: Thesis vs. antithesis
results in synthesis.
It's like two companies with undisclosed common stockholding
submitting competitive tenders for a project on a site for which
their stockholder has different plans altogether. Whatever the
outcome, the stockholder is in beneficial control.
Here are some illustrations of the Hegelian Dialectic process:-
The Globalist Elite
| |
Thesis Antithesis
| |
Marxist Russia Nazi Germany
| Conflict of |
| World War II |
1917 Bolshevik Revolution 1933 Hitler's accession to power
USA Constructs and subsidizes USA constructs and subsidizes
Soviet Union 1920 -- present National Socialism
| |
Profit
|
Synthesis
|
Post World War II United Nations, a step towards New World Order
__________________________________________
Since World War II:-
The Globalist Elite
| |
Thesis Antithesis
| |
Marxist Russia Capitalist West
| (no longer Free Enterprise)
| Conflict of |
| Cold War |
USA Constructs and subsidizes USA constructs and subsidizes
Soviet Union | Germany, Japan, Israel, Foreign
| Aid, Korea, Vietnam, etc.
| |
Profit
|
Synthesis
|
Detente, Glasnost, Perestroika, destruction of the Berlin Wall
and supposed collapse of Soviet Union. One step closer to NWO.
__________________________________________
At the present day:-
The Globalist Elite
| |
Thesis Antithesis
| |
Communist China USA and/or CIS (Russia)
| Conflict |
| |
West see Russia as under threat from China and unite with CIS
| |
Profit
|
Synthesis
|
New World Order
__________________________________________
In our adversarial 'two' party politics:-
The Globalist Elite
| |
Thesis Antithesis
| |
Aust. Liberal Party Aust. Labor Party
or or
(US. Republican Party) (US. Democratic Party)
| Conflict of |
| general election |
Multimillion dollar borrowing of campaign funds
| |
Profit
|
Synthesis
|
Australia becomes a Republic so that new Constitution permits
usurpation of States' sovereignty and National Sovereignty
surrendered for Asian regionalization in NWO.
__________________________________________
In recent Sydney news:-
The Globalist Elite
| |
Thesis Antithesis
| |
NSW State Government Aborigine activists in Redfern
| Developers/financiers
| Conflict of street |
| violence and arson |
Desire to evict and resettle Free relocation of Aboriginie
Aboriginie residents outside tenants to brand new homes.
Metropolitan Sydney prior to Profit from redevelopment of
2000 Olympic Games. Beautify site and subsequent sale of
and redevelop as commercial slums transformed to luxury
or inner-city apartments for inner-city apartments, shopping
wealthy Chinese with a view and commercial complex whilst
to huge increase in rates. retaining some ownership.
| |
Profit
|
Synthesis
|
A FURTHER step towards the destruction of Australia's once
homogeneous society with development of largest Asian Colony
to date in the heart of Sydney.
__________________________________________
In the religious world of AD325:-
Satan
|
Constantine and Rome
| |
Thesis Antithesis
| |
Athanasius Arius
| Conflict of |
| theology |
Trinitarianism Unitarianism
| |
Conflict of human reasoning
culminating in First Nicea Council
|
Profit
|
Synthesis
|
Recognition of carnal reasoning against Christian faith and
its institutionalization under State patronage and control.
Eventual outlawing of Christian faith and the persecution of
true saints by the false church until today, true Christianity
is accounted heresy and ridiculed by most Bible students.
__________________________________________
In the religious world of Papal Rome:-
Satan
|
The Globalist Elite
| |
Thesis Antithesis
| |
Roman Catholicism Protestantism
| Conflict of |
| theology |
Counter Reformation Reformation
Great harlot Prostitute daughters
Vatican II World Council of Churches
End of Gentile Dispensation
Beast unites with Image to the Beast
Incarnation of Pope Apostasy
| |
Profit
|
Synthesis
|
Union of churches to stop Communism and rule New World Order
__________________________________________
- In his novel
"Conningsby", Disraeli wrote "the world
is governed by very different personages from what is imagined
by those who are not behind the scenes".
Woodrow Wilson said, "Some of the biggest men in the
United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are
afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there
is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so
interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better
not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation
of it".
Now for our text. In Matthew 16:6, Jesus said, "Take
heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and of the Sadducees".
This is another illustration of Hegelian dialectics or logical
argument. In other words, the mark of the beast: wisdom against
faith.
Here were two denominations each inspired by Satan, whose purpose
was to contest the Laws and Ordinances of the Old Testament.
One was the THESIS, the other its ANTITHESIS.
Neither could agree on the Word or recognize It manifested before
them. The SYNTHESIS through the apostasy of both
parties was their own damnation through rejection and crucifixion
of Messiah. Even their high priest declared, "His blood
be upon us and upon our people". And It has been ever
since.
The synthesis sought by the Establishment is called the New World
Order. Without CONTROLLED conflict, this New World Order
will not come about. RANDOM individual actions of persons
in society would not lead to this synthesis, it is ARTIFICIAL,
therefore it has to be created. And this is being done with the
calculated, MANAGED, use of conflict. And all the while
this synthesis is being sought, there is no profit in playing
the involved parties against one another. (Hence World War I
was postponed three times until the pawns were in their predetermined
places). This also explains why the International bankers backed
the Nazis, the Soviet Union, North Korea, North Vietnam, etc.,
against the United States. The 'conflict' built profits while
pushing the world ever closer to One World Government.
The Establishment is ruled by elite, secret societies. Their
operations must be seen and explained in terms of the Hegelian
dialectic process. Their operations cannot be explained in terms
of any other philosophy; therefore they cannot be described as
"right" or "left", Marxist
or Capitalist. However, one group is secular, and another is
religious. The religious force is the Roman Catholic church.
We are familiar with their place in history and in prophecy.
Our teaching will consider the secular group and its objectives
which is ALL of these and NONE of these.
In Hegelian philosophy the conflict of political 'right' and
political 'left', or thesis and antithesis in Hegelian terms,
is essential to the forward movement of history and historical
change itself. Conflict between thesis and antithesis brings
about a synthesis or new historical situation.
Our descriptive world history in the West and Marxist countries
consists only of description and analysis within a political
framework of 'right' or 'left'. For example, historical work
published in the West looks at communism and socialism either
through the eyes of financial capitalism, or Marxism. While historical
work published in Russia looks at the West only through Marxist
eyes. However, there is another frame of historical analysis
that has never been utilized. This would employ a framework of
Hegelian logic, to determine if the elites who control the State
use the dialectic process to create a predetermined historical
synthesis.
The current world situation was deliberately created by elitist
power more or less by manipulation of 'right' and 'left' elements.
Over the past 100 years or so they've developed both right and
left elements to bring about a NWO. Right-left situations have
been deliberately created and then placed in conflict mode to
bring about a synthesis.
Since the rise of Kant (who stressed reason and experience) in
German philosophy, we can identify two conflicting systems of
philosophy; and therefore two opposing ideas of the State, society
and culture.
In the U.S., the British Commonwealth and France, philosophy
is based on the individual and the rights of the individual.
Whereas in Germany from the time of Kant, through Fichte and
Hegel up to 1945, basic philosophy has been universal brotherhood,
rejection of individualism, and general opposition to Western
classical liberal thought in almost all of its aspects. German
idealism was the philosophical basis for the work of Karl Marx
and the LEFT Hegelians, as well as Bismarck, Hitler and
the RIGHT Hegelians. The paradox is that Hegel gave a
theoretical basis not only to the most conservative of German
movements, but also to most of the revolutionary movements of
the 19th century. Both Marx and Hitler have their philosophical
roots in Hegel.
From the Hegelian system of political thought, alien to most
of us in the West, stem such absurdities as the State seen as
the "March of God through history", that the
State is also God, and the only duty of a citizen is to serve
God by serving the State, that the State is Absolute Reason and
citizens can only find freedom by worship and utter obedience
to the State. Other Hegelian absurdities have thoroughly penetrated
our education system. But that is for another topic.
From this system of Hegelian philosophy comes the historical
dialectic, "that all historical events emerge from a
conflict between opposing forces." These emerging events
are above and different from the conflicting events. Any idea
or implementation of an idea may be seen as THESIS.
This thesis will encourage emergence of opposing forces, known
as ANTITHESIS. The final outcome will be NEITHER
thesis nor antithesis, but a SYNTHESIS of the two
forces in conflict.
In DAS KAPITAL, Marx posed capitalism as thesis and communism
as antithesis. What has been completely ignored by historians,
including Marxists, is that any clash between these forces cannot
lead to a society which is either capitalist or communist but
must lead to a society characterized by a SYNTHESIS
of the two conflicting forces. The clash of opposites must in
the Hegelian system, bring about a society neither capitalist
nor communist. Moreover, in the Hegelian scheme of events, this
new synthesis will reflect the concept of the State as God, and
the individual as totally subordinate to an all powerful State.
This was the thought we encountered in "Hubris".
The function of a Parliament or a Congress is for Hegelians,
psychology. Merely to allow individuals
to feel that their opinions have some value, and to allow a government
to take advantage of whatever wisdom the 'peasant' may accidentally
demonstrate. This is so obvious in Australian politics today.
As Hegel puts it:
"By virtue of this participation, subjective liberty
and conceit, with their general opinion, (individuals) can show
themselves palpably efficacious and enjoy the satisfaction of
feeling themselves to count for something."
War, the organized conflict of nations for Hegelians, is only
the visible outcome of the clash between ideas. Following the
outbreak of war in 1939, Social Creditor C.H. Douglas said, "The
international money marketeers care no more for the immolation
of the peoples of a continent that for the death of a sparrow";
and "unfortunately the world is in the grasp of theorists
to whom misery and death of millions is a grain of sand beside
the working out of their designs". As John Dewey, the
Hegelian darling of the modern educational system, puts it:
"War is the most effective preacher of the vanity of
all merely finite interests, it puts an end to that selfish egoism
of the individual by which he would claim his life and his property
as his own or as his family's."
Above all, the Hegelian doctrine is the divine right of
States rather than the divine right of kings. The State
for Hegel and Hegelians is God on earth:
"The march of God in history is the cause of the existence
of states, their foundation is the power of Reason realizing
itself as will. Every state, whatever it be, participates in
the Divine essence. The State is not the work of human art, only
Reason could produce it."
For Hegel the individual is nothing, the individual has no rights,
morality consists solely in following a leader.
Compare this to the spirit and letter of the Australian Constitution:
"WHEREAS the people" grant the State some powers
and reserve all others to the people. Whilst it recognizes no
State denomination, it places the Christian God as its Head,
unlike Hegel's "the State is God on earth."
To elitists like The Order in the USA, The Group in
the UK, Illuminati in Germany, and the Politburo in
Russia, the State is supreme, and a self-appointed elite running
the State acts as God on earth.
Manipulation of 'left' and 'right' in domestic USA, where Wall
Street supports both Republicans and Democrats, as their Australian
associates support Liberal and Labor, is duplicated in the international
field where 'left' and 'right' political structures are artificially
constructed and collapsed in the drive for a one-world synthesis.
In fact, 'left' and 'right' are two controlled factions of the
Illuminati.
Textbooks present war and revolution as more or less accidental
results of conflicting forces. The decay of political negotiations
into physical conflict comes about, according to these books,
after valiant efforts to avoid war. Unfortunately, this is nonsense.
War is always a deliberate creative act by individuals.
The Tribunals that investigated Nazi war criminals were careful
to censor any records of Western Assistance to Hitler.
And Western textbooks on Soviet economic development omit any
description of the economic and financial aid given to the 1917
Revolution and subsequent economic development by Western firms
and banks.
Revolution is always recorded as a spontaneous event by
the politically or economically deprived against an autocratic
state. Western textbooks never reveal the evidence that revolutions
need finance; and the source of the finance in
many cases traces back to Wall Street.
Of course our Western history is every bit as distorted, censored,
and largely useless as that of Hitler's Germany, the Soviet Union
or Communist China. No Western foundation will award grants to
investigate their own benefactors. Few Western scholars can survive
by researching such theses, and publishing houses daring to accept
such manuscripts suffer intimidation or even violence from the
Establishment. The recent trials of David Irving with his erstwhile
publisher bears this out.
Like the true revelation of God's Word, largely unrecorded history
tells a story contrary to what we've been taught to regard as
truth. A story of the deliberate creation of war, the knowing
finance of revolution to change governments, and the use of conflict
to create a New World Order.
We will explore thesis and antithesis in the development and
construction of the Soviet Union (thesis) and Hitler's
Germany (antithesis). We will also explore the continuation
of this dialectic conflict into the last few decades, specifically
in China today and show that the purpose is to create a new synthesis,
a New World Order along Hegelian lines where the State is Absolute
and the individual can find freedom only in blind obedience to
the State.
Something we have to do is to break an almost universal mindset,
that Communists and Capitalists are bitter enemies. This Marxist
axiom is a false statement and for a century has fooled academics
and investigators alike. The key to understanding modern history
is that elitists had as close working relations with both Marxists
and Nazis as they have with Marxists and Capitalists.
After World War II the world stage was changed. After 1945 it
became the Soviet Union on one side versus the United States
on the other. The first dialectical clash led to the formation
of the United Nations, an elementary step on the road to world
government. The second dialectical clash led to the Trilateral
Commission and REGIONAL groups, like Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia
from "1984," and more subtly to efforts for
a merger of the United States and the Soviet Union. Definitely
Orwellian! Various stooges 'fronting' for the faceless elite
agitate for a new Constitution that will enable them to usurp
Australia's sovereignty and absorb us into an Asian Bloc, ruled
from Beijing or Tokyo.
Western Christian civilization, whose domain was very nearly
the world, had expanded without notable recession until in 1914.
In 1917 it began a retreat that has since been uninterrupted
(Matthew 24:7-8). Huge amounts of Western property, much of it
in land, factories and mines, has been stolen by revolutionaries,
or abandoned by Western owners. Political and strategic losses
are of more lasting and fundamental importance. But it is not
politically correct to criticize its demise today.
World history since 1917 reflects an application of Hegelian
dialectics. Russia was taken over by mainly Askenazi Jews
from the East End of New York who established Socialism, later
called Communism. This Revolution was planned by international
financiers and financed by Wall Street. Indeed Woodrow Wilson
sent US troops who took over and held the Siberian Railroad from
1918 to impede the transport of grain and raw materials to Germany,
and so far as possible prevent commerce, until the Soviets were
sufficiently established to take over. US troops remained until
1920.
Thus we see governments need censorship to classify certain files
for thirty or fifty years after events, to protect the living
from charges of treason, and to conceal the past intrigues and
long term goals of the hidden elite who call the shots.
Soviet Russia's first Five Year Plan was devised by Detroit-based
Albert Kahn, Inc., and Russia's industry financed by Wall Street.
Thus was the THESIS: Communism, established.
But the MARXIST version of the Hegelian dialectic poses
financial CAPITALISM as thesis, and Marxist revolution
as antithesis. An obvious puzzle in this Marxian statement is
the nature of the SYNTHESIS presumed to evolve
out of the clash of these OPPOSITES. It cannot be Communism!
Lenin's statement that the State will wither away at the synthesis
stage is nonsensical. In fact, as all contemporary Marxist states
testify, in practice, the State becomes all powerful. The immediate
task of "the revolution" is to convey all power
to the State, and modern Marxist states operate under a constant
paranoia that power may indeed pass away from the hands of the
State into the hands of the people.
If MARXISM is posed as the thesis and NATIONAL SOCIALISM
as antithesis, then the most likely SYNTHESIS becomes
a Hegelian NEW WORLD ORDER, a synthesis evolving out of
the clash of Marxism and national socialism. Moreover, in THIS
statement those who FINANCE and MANAGE the clash
of opposites can REMAIN in control of the synthesis.
The elite have artificially encouraged and developed BOTH
revolutionary Marxism and national socialism while retaining
some control over the nature and degree of the conflict, therefore
it is able to determine the evolution and nature of the New World
Order.
Out of war and revolution come opportunities for profit by corporations
under the control and influence of these elites. In the two World
Wars, the Korean and Vietnamese Wars, there are numerous examples
of American banks and corporations trading with the enemy.
The antithesis, National Socialism, is no more. The Cold War
is over, so we're taught the thesis of Russian Communism is also
dead. This leaves the once Christian now Capitalist West. Since
we are 'friends', the West now finances Russia at government
level, increasing profits and reducing risks for the international
bankers.
To prevent history coming to its end (he says tongue in cheek)
the elite introduced a new dialectic process. World War II was
the culmination of the dialectic process created in the 1920s
and 1930s. The clash between 'left' and 'right', the Soviet Union
and Nazi Germany, led to creation of a synthesis - the UN, and
a start towards regional groupings in NATO, the Common Market,
UNESCO, Warsaw Pact, SEATO, CIS, then the Trilateral Commission.
A start towards New World Order.
World War II left the Elite with the necessity to create a new
dialectical situation to promote MORE conflict to achieve a higher
level synthesis.
The source of this process may be found in US National Security
Memorandum No. 68 of 1950 which opened up the road for Western
technology to build a more advanced Soviet Union - which it did
in the 1960s and 1970s with computerized space-age technology.
In true Hegelian tradition it simultaneously argued for massive
expansion of US defenses - on grounds of a future Soviet threat.
(Which would not have been possible without the transfer of Western
technology). Thus the internationalists profited from Soviet
and US purchases.
The principal devices used to control the dialectic process in
the past two decades have been (a) information, (b) debt and
(c) technology. These have become diluted over time. They don't
work as well today as they did in the 1950s.
By and large, control of INFORMATION
has been successful because the intellectual world is still locked
into a phony verbal battle between 'left' and 'right', whereas
the real struggle is the battle between individual freedom and
the encroaching power of the absolute State. The Soviet Union,
with its tight censorship, presents a strictly Marxist ('left')
orientation to its citizens. The enemy is always the 'fascist'
United States. The West is a little more complicated but not
much more so. Whereas financial power is used to control politics,
information is used to control human perceptions.
Brethren, to the elites, we're 'human cattle' participating
in a double blind laboratory experiment. By God's Grace, the
elect can't be deceived on the revealed Word of God, which, as
a sharp two-edged sword, divides asunder these deceptions.
In the West the choice is basically between a controlled 'left-oriented'
information, and a controlled 'right-oriented' information. The
conflict between the two CONTROLLED groups keeps an apparent
informational conflict alive. Unwelcome facts that fall into
either camp are conveniently forgotten. Books that fall into
either camp can be effectively neutralized because they will
incur the wrath of both 'right' and 'left'. The faster the cattle
run, the faster the treadmill takes them to nowhere.
Any publication which points up the fallacy of the Left-Right
dichotomy is ignored . . . and citizens keep trooping down to
the polling booths in the belief they have a 'choice'. Witness
Australian elections. The Labor and Liberal Parties frankly admit
their policies are common.
The second control mechanism is DEBT. We all
understand that. If Marxist countries have to import technology,
they need to earn or borrow Western currencies to pay for it.
Loans have to be repaid. So to some extent, debtors are under
control of creditors, unless they default. And therein lies the
weakness.
The third control mechanism is TECHNOLOGY.
If technology to advance to more efficient production levels
has to be imported, then the recipient is always kept away from
the 'state of the art'. The weakness for the elite is that military
technology does not require a market system.
The dialectic plan therefore misfired for several reasons. Firstly,
the informational blackouts were not as successful as they expected.
Control of Time and Newsweek gave them dominance
over weekly news summaries. The TV networks have been able to
orchestrate viewers reactions - to some extent - by propaganda
in movies. (For example, when I went to the giant IMAX movie
theatre, I noticed propaganda for the 'Greenhouse' HOAX
had been subtly included in the narrative). But the elite were
unable to restrict individuals and relatively small non-academic
groups, almost always outside Universities (whose curricula they
control) from exploring obvious inconsistencies in Establishment
propaganda. These groups, often mistakenly termed 'left' or 'right,'
are outside the manipulated left-right spectrum.
Secondly, the debt weapon was over-used. Communist countries
are now saturated with debt to Western bankers.
Thirdly, while technology is still a useful weapon, there are
distinct stirrings among independent analysts of the danger posed
for the Western world by building enemies.
We've spent 50 years arming our enemies, and developing their
industries with our technology. And under the LIMA Agreement,
have transferred our manufacturing infrastructure offshore. Last
year China purchased the whole of New Zealand's forests "in
perpetuity" for US$80 million donated by Australia. No wonder
our Aborigines are caught up in Communist ideas when we give
money to foreign nations who consider us "barbarians,"
and to others, who have the Northern half of our continent colored
green and labeled "South Irian" in their school atlases
and on military maps.
Brother Branham said the West was trying to buy her friends,
and when we can no longer afford to bribe them we will discover
they are our enemies (This Day This Scripture, 16:132; Influences,
7:40; Genesis 3:15).
Even without interference by the international bankers the consequences
are alarming, both for America and for the Western world. The
West has a brief opportunity between the decline of Russia and
the rise of China. Europe has wasted most of the present decade
by pursuing the dangerous IRRELEVANCE of the single currency.
(No doubt a ploy of her fairweather banking friends). America
has wasted it on a shallow prosperity; even the recovery hasn't
greatly strengthened the US economy. Neither Europe nor America
is prepared for the global competition of the next century. For
America, the progressive shift of wealth and power to Asia will
be humiliating, and perhaps destabilizing.
Consequently, in today's world we can identify two facts in construction
of a new dialectic. First, cautious reinforcement of the Marxian
arm - for example: Marxist Angola got a green light, Marxist
Grenada got a red light.
Second, the construction of a completely new arm, that of Communist
China, itself Marxist, but with conflict potential for the Soviet
Union. Major efforts are in progress, only partly revealed in
the press, to create a new superpower in conflict mode with the
Soviet Union. This is the new antithesis, replacing Nazi Germany.
American involvement in China began with Wall Street's intervention
into Dr. Sun Yat Sen's revolution of 1911. During World War II
the US helped the Chinese Communists into power. The decision
to build Communist China as a new arm of the dialectic was made
under Richard Nixon and executed by Henry Kissinger and George
Bush.
By the turn of the century, Communist China will be a "superpower"
built by American technology and skill, presumably for
conflict with Russia. What then is left for the USA but an 'accommodation'
with the CIS to set up a world government.
"And the sixth angel poured out his vial upon the great
river Euphrates; and the water thereof was dried up, that the
way of the kings of the East might be prepared" (Revelation
16:12). The drawing-away of the Holy Spirit from apostatising
Western (once Christian) civilization gradually diminished our
invisible barrier and defence of faith in the Word. Thus the
pagan ways of the kings of the East were entertained and adopted
in place of faith. Foreign aid, intermarriage, immigration and
preferential tariffs began. We have since transferred our manufacturing
industries to these strange people. With no manufacturing we
have unemployment and no self-reliance in the event of hostilities.
Furthermore, we fall further under obligation to the foreign
bankers.
The Hegelian dialectic is being employed to secure and sustain
absolute world power and authority to an elite. We have fallen
into a Hegelian trap and don't know it. bb970219.htm
e-mail to: ags@biblebelievers.org.au
- Sermons are about these subjects:
- http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/teach016.htm#Teaching%20Sermons%20based%20on%20the
|