Jesus, Zoraster, Buddha, Socrates
& Muhammad:
The Life, Death and Teaching of Jesus
Compared with Other Great Religious Figures
By Edwin M. Yamauchi, Ph.D.
Copyright © 1971 Edwin M. Yamauchi.
Used with permission.
The author, Edwin M. Yamauchi, is professor of history at Miami
University,
Oxford, Ohio. This article was originally published as "Historical
Notes on the
(In)comparable Christ," in Christianity Today, October
22, 1971, pp. 7-11.
One hears conflicting estimates of Jesus. Christians believe
he is incomparable, without a peer, but they are often quite
ignorant of the lives of other great spiritual leaders. On the
other hand, some people speak of Jesus, Buddha, Socrates and
others without acknowledging any differences. Walter Lippmann,
for example, remarks, "There is no doubt that in one form
or another, Socrates and Buddha, Jesus and St. Paul, Plotinus
and Spinoza, taught that the good life is impossible without
asceticism
." (1) Arnold Toynbee
asks: "Now who are the individuals who are the greatest
benefactors of the living generation of mankind? I should say:
Confucius and Lao-tse; the Buddha; the Prophets of Israel and
Judah; Zoroaster, Jesus, and Muhammad; and Socrates." (2) One may cite many syncretistic movements
in the United States, Japan and elsewhere, such as Baha'i, which
attempt to combine the teachings of various religious leaders.
The purpose of this essay is to highlight Jesus' life, death
and teachings by comparing and contrasting them with Zoroaster,
Buddha, Socrates and Muhammad. We have chosen these four because
many people today, in their search for meaning, are looking to
these men and the traditions they have generated. We will divide
the investigation into five categories: (1) the sources available
for reconstructing the lives of these teachers, (2) their birth
and family, (3) their life and teachings, (4) their death and
(5) their relation to deity. After the data become clear, we
will be able to see where the uniqueness of Jesus lies.
SOURCES
From a historian's point of view there are serious disparities
in the sources available for reconstructing the lives of Zoroaster,
Buddha, Socrates, Muhammad and Jesus. We need to distinguish
sharply between first-hand or nearly contemporary sources and
later apocryphal and legendary materials.
Zoroaster (628-551 B.C.). We have what appear to be
the genuine sayings of Zoroaster in the Gathas of the
Avesta. The mass of Zoroastrian texts, however,
are in late Pahlavi recensions (ninth century A.D.). Contemporary
Old Persian cuneiform inscriptions betray at best only allusions
to early Zoroastrianism. Some Greek and Arabic authors also allude
to Zoroaster. The Persian national epic, the Shah Namah
by Firdausi (c. A.D. 1000), includes traditions of the
prophet.
Buddha (563-483 B.C.). Buddha's teachings, after many
centuries of being passed on orally, were written down for the
first time in the first century B.C. in Ceylon. The earliest
written texts which have been preserved are in Pali, an Indo-Aryan
dialect which may be the dialect Buddha himself used. The Pali
canon of the Hinayana school (the southern branch of Buddhism,
also called the Theravada school) is known as the Tipitaka
(Sanskrit Tripitaka), meaning "Three Baskets."
Portions of this collection, such as the Samyutta Nikaya,
the Majjhima Nikaya and the Anguttara Nikaya, may
have come into existence two centuries after Buddha's death,
but other portions originated much later.
The Sanskrit canon of the Mahayana school, which spread northeastward
to Tibet, China, Korea and Japan, dates, at the earliest, to
the first and second centuries A.D. According to Christmas Humphreys,
"the later Sutras of the Mahayana School, though put into
Buddha's mouth, are clearly the work of minds which lived from
five to fifteen hundred years after his passing" (3)
In the later sources one notes a conspicuous exaggeration
of the supernatural elements in Buddha's life. But even the earliest
traditions, separated as they are by a century or two from Buddha's
time, are not free from amplification. As M. Winternitz observes,
"Even what are generally considered to be our oldest documents,
the texts of the Pali Tipitaka, speak of Buddha often enough
as a superhuman being, and tell us more of the legendary man
than of the historical Buddha." (4)
Socrates (469-399 B.C.). We are fortunate in having
the accounts of two of Socrates' own disciples, Plato and Xenophon,
as well as notices collected by Diogenes Laertius (third century
A.D.). We cannot accept these accounts uncritically, of course,
because it is difficult to know how much of Plato's dialogues
is really Socratic and how much Platonic. Another problem is
that Xenophon's Memorabilia and other writings were composed
to refute the Sophists' attacks against Socrates. (5)
Muhammad (A.D. 570-632). In the Qur'an (Koran) we have
the authentic sayings of Muhammad, which were at first written
down on skins, palm leaves, pottery and even the shoulder blades
of sheep. Shortly after the prophet's death the caliph Uthman
(644-55) collected these sayings in a canonical edition. In the
Hadith we have numerous oral traditions about the words
and actions of Muhammad, traditions involving even such details
as his regularly brushing his teeth. Some two centuries after
the prophet's death Al-Bukhari sifted through some 600,000 traditions
to obtain 7,000 Hadith which he thought were genuine. The first
life of Muhammad, based on the Qur'an and the Hadith, is the
ninth-century Sirat ar-Rasul by Ibn Hisham.
Jesus (5 B.C.-A.D. 30). Our main sources of information
about the life of Jesus are the canonical Gospels of Matthew,
Mark, Luke and John. There is some dispute over the identity
of the authors, but it is generally held that Matthew, a converted
tax-collector, and John, a fisherman, were two of Jesus' apostles.
Mark was an eyewitness as Jesus and the apostles met in his home,
and later he learned more about Jesus from Peter, whom, according
to Irenaeus, he served as an interpreter. Luke, a physician who
accompanied Paul, made use of eyewitness accounts for his Gospel.
Mark, the earliest Gospel, may have been written as early as
A.D. 50; (6)
Luke was probably written before A.D. 64; and Matthew
shortly after A.D. 70.(7) Although it
has been customary to date John's Gospel approximately A.D. 90,
some scholars have recently favored a date in the 70's or 80's.
(8) Jesus spoke in Aramaic, but the Gospels
are in Greek.
Apart from the four canonical Gospels, and some data which
can be gleaned from the letters of the apostles Paul, Peter and
John, little else is helpful or trustworthy. References to Jesus
in the rabbinical literature are veiled and hostile. The famous
passage in the first-century A.D. Jewish historian Josephus (Antiquities
VIII: 63-64) is authentic, but there are Christian interpolations
in the extant Greek text.(9) References
in second-century Roman writers such as Tacitus, Suetonius and
Pliny the Younger bear testimony to the fact that Christianity
had spread throughout the Roman Empire as early as the reign
of Claudius (A.D. 41-54). The mass of apocryphal Gospels from
the second and third centuries are interesting but historically
worthless. Some scholars believe that the recently discovered
Coptic Gospel of Thomas, a Gnostic work from approximately A.D.
140, may have preserved some genuine sayings of Jesus. (10)
BIRTH AND FAMILY
Zoroaster Zoroaster (or Zarathustra) was born into
the Spitama clan, evidently in northwestern Iran though he ministered
in northeastern Iran. According to Arabic sources he lived from
628 to 551 B.C., which would accord with the tradition that he
converted Hystaspes, the father of Darius who ruled the Persian
Empire from 522-486 B.C. (Greek sources were greatly mistaken
in placing Zoroaster 6000 years before Plato!) Zoroaster was
married three times and had several sons and daughters.
Buddha Buddha, who is also known as Siddhartha (his
given name), Gautama (his family name) and Sakyamuni (sage of
the Sakya) was born in Kapilavastu, now in southern Nepal. His
father Suddhodana was a rajah of the Sakya clan. His mother Maya
died a few days after his birth. At the age of nineteen Gautama
was married to the beautiful princess Yasodhara, who bore him
a son Rahula. After ten years Gautama ventured out of his cloistered
estate and, according to the traditions, saw for the first time
an old man, a sick man, a dead man and an ascetic. So struck
was he by these sights that he abandoned his family to become
a wandering monk.
Socrates Socrates was born in Athens to Sophroniscus,
an artisan-sculptor, and to Phenarete, a mid-wife. We know nothing
about his youth. As someone has remarked, "You would think
the Master was born an old man, with no childhood." His
wife was the notorious shrew, Xanthippe. Socrates remarked that
if he could master Xanthippe he could easily adapt himself to
the rest of the world. But Socrates might well have paid more
attention to the material needs of their three sons.
Muhammad Muhammad was born in Mecca about A.D. 570
into the Quraish tribe. Because his father died before he was
born and his mother passed away when he was six, the lad was
raised by a grandmother and then by an uncle. As a young man
he worked in the caravans of Khadija, a rich widow whom he later
married, though she was twenty years his senior. Although Muslims
may be married only to four wives, Muhammad himself did not abide
by this limit, having ten wives and additional concubines. One
of his favorites was A'isha, who came to Muhammad when she was
but nine, bringing her toys with her. Muhammad received a special
revelation (Qur'an 33:37) to justify his marriage to the beautiful
Zainab, the wife of his adopted son Zaid. In spite of these many
unions, the prophet never had a full-grown son, a fact which
affected the struggles for the caliphate (or succession).
Jesus The monk Dionysius Exiguus (A.D. 533), who devised
our modern calendar with its reckoning B.C. and A.D., miscalculated
the reign of Octavian-Augustus by at least four years. Since
Herod the Great died just after an eclipse of the moon which
can be placed at 4 B.C. and since he was still alive at Jesus'
birth, Jesus must have been born before this date.
According to Luke and Matthew, Jesus was conceived by a virgin
named Mary while she was legally engaged but not yet married
to Joseph of Nazareth. They were both Jews in the royal line
of King David, from whence the Messiah prophesied in the Old
Testament was to come. When she was about to have the child,
Mary traveled with Joseph about seventy miles south to their
ancestral home of Bethlehem because the emperor Augustus had
ordered an Empire-wide census (Luke 2:1). Jesus was thus born
in Bethlehem, fulfilling a prophecy written seven hundred years
before (Micah 5:2). Joseph and Mary were quite poor, as evidenced
by their offerings in the Temple (Luke 2:24; cf. Leviticus 12:8).
The canonical Gospels record that Mary and Joseph returned
to Nazareth and had other children. These brothers and sisters
were not sympathetic to Jesus' mission (Mark 3:31-35; Matthew
13:55-56). Later, however, his brother James played a leading
role in the church. James and another brother Jude wrote letters
which are included in the New Testament.
The canonical Gospels record only one incident in Jesus' childhood.
When he was twelve he impressed the rabbis in Jerusalem with
his questions and answers (Luke 2:41-52). In contrast, the apocryphal
infancy Gospels (dating from the second century A.D. on) attribute
all kinds of absurd miracles to the young Jesus, for example,
portraying him making live pigeons out of clay and petulantly
striking some of his playmates dead.(11)
Although marriage was considered a religious duty by most
Jews (the Essenes were the exception), Jesus never married.
LIFE AND TEACHINGS
Zoroaster Zoroaster served as a priest of the polytheistic
Iranian religion before he was converted at age thirty to the
sole worship of Ahura Mazda. He succeeded in converting some
of his kinsmen and also Hystaspes, a king in northeastern Iran.
When his new teaching met strong opposition, he responded by
pronouncing curses upon his opponents. Zoroaster also denounced
the intoxicating cult of the haoma plant and exhibited
great concern for the care of cattle. In Zoroaster's view material
prosperity and godliness went hand in hand, a trait perhaps reflected
today in the remarkable prosperity of the Parsees (modern Zoroastrians)
in Bombay, India.
Buddha After six years of searching for peace through
asceticism, Gautama came to the town of Uruvela in northeastern
India. There he sat under the Bodhi tree (a gigantic fig tree)
and determined to stay until he received Enlightenment. Forty-nine
days later he was illuminated, becoming the Buddha, which means
"Enlightened One." Buddha preached his first sermons
in Benares when he was thirty-five. He succeeded in converting
his ascetic companions, then his parents and his wife, and eventually
King Bimbisara.
Buddha's teachings may be summarized in the Four Noble Truths
and the Eightfold Path. The Four Noble Truths are (1) suffering
exists, (2) suffering has a cause, (3) suffering can be eliminated,
(4) ways to eliminate suffering. Buddha taught that all that
exists is impermanent and that lasting happiness cannot be found
in samsara, the temporal world of change. The way to Nirvana
is to eliminate desire, which is the cause of suffering. Desire
is not eliminated by gratification nor by mortification but by
the Middle Way of the Eightfold Path, which involves (1) right
views, (2) aspirations, (3) speech, (4) conduct, (5) livelihood,
(6) effort, (7) mindfulness and (8) contemplation.
Legends ascribe all kinds of miracles to Buddha: By washing
his hands over the seed of a ripe mango, he caused a tree to
spring up fifty-hands high. Once he flew into the sky with fire
and water streaming from various parts of his body. He performed
these miracles, according to a Jataka account, to dispel
the gods' doubts about his mission.
Socrates A report of the Delphic
Oracle proclaimed that Socrates was the wisest man in the world.
Believing that this could not be true, Socrates was impelled
on a life of constantly questioning people in order to find someone
who was truly wise. As he interrogated citizens in the streets
and gymnasiums of Athens, he attracted to himself a coterie of
well-born young men. Unfortunately some of these disciples, such
as Alcibiades and Critias, turned out to be such scoundrels that
this factor played a role in his condemnation.(12)
Rather than teaching a set of doctrines, Socrates tried to
get men to think for themselves. The philosophers who preceded
him had focused on the nature of the universe, but Socrates turned
his attention to man and man's behavior. Aristotle and Cicero
credited him with founding ethics. His main teaching, as best
we can determine from his interpreters, was that all values can
be reduced to a single virtue, knowledge. Virtue, then, can be
taught. Evil is blindness: No one does evil on purpose. He who
knows the good will do it.
Muhammad After Muhammad received his initial revelation
when he was about forty years old, he began preaching an uncompromising
monotheism, which so infuriated the pagan Meccans that they made
him flee to Medina in the famous Hijra of A.D. 622. After the
Jews of Medina rejected his overtures, he changed the qibla,
or direction of prayer, to face Mecca rather than Jerusalem.
Muhammad's forces battled various opponents and killed many,
including hundreds of Jews. The Prophet, who did not fight in
person, showed mercy to captives after the capture of Mecca.
The Qur'an does not claim that Muhammad performed any miracles.
But traditions ascribe numerous wonders to him: "Butter,
a part of which Muhammad had eaten, increased continually."
"A tree moved from its place of its own accord and shaded
Muhammad while he slept." "A wolf spoke and converted
a Jew." According to Francesco Gabrielli, "His character
appeared to later tradition and piety as the sum of all the moral
virtues
by dint of adding to the genuine testimonies of
the Prophet's life and character the fantansies [sic] of apologetics."
(13)
The five pillars of Islam are (1) the Shahada, or creed,
which affirms, "There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad
is his prophet," (2) Salat, prayer, five times a
day facing Mecca, (3) Zakat, or alms, (4) fasting during
Ramadhan, the ninth lunar month, which involves a strict
abstinence from both food and drink during daylight, and (5)
for those who can perform it, the Hajj, or pilgrimage
to Mecca. When in Mecca the pilgrim must make a circuit around
the Kaaba building and kiss the black meteorite stone enclosed
in its walls.
Since the followers of Muhammad do not worship him, they should
not be called "Mohammadens." They should be called
"Muslims," from the word "Islam," which connotes
their submission to Allah.
Jesus Until his thirtieth year, Jesus remained in Nazareth,
presumably working as a carpenter (Luke 3:23). Then he began
his ministry by submitting to the baptism of John the Baptist.
Jesus, who had no formal training as a rabbi, did not speak like
the rabbis of his day; they cited their predecessors as their
authorities while Jesus spoke on his own authority (Matthew 5:27-28,
7:28-29).
Since we know Jesus appeared at three or four Passover festivals,
his public ministry must have lasted three to three-and-a-half
years. During this time he trained a band of twelve apostles
and many other disciples. He went about teaching, healing the
sick and raising the dead (for example, John 11). Jewish rabbinical
sources do not deny these miracles but rather attribute them
to demonic magic. Speaking of the miracles attributed to Christ
in the canonical Gospels, F.F. Bruce comments: "In general,
they are 'in character' that is to say, they are the kind
of works that might be expected from such a Person as the Gospels
represent Jesus to be."(14)
Like his forerunner John the Baptist, Jesus preached that
men must repent of their sins (Luke 13:3-5), that is, men must
acknowledge God's judgment against their sinfulness and seek
his forgiveness and cleansing. He taught that men should seek
the will of God and his kingdom, rather than any earthly kingdom
or temporal goal (Matthew 6). He insisted that men should love
not only their neighbors but even their enemies (Matthew 5:44).
Above all, Jesus taught that God loves men so much he had
sent his only son, Jesus himself, to become incarnate as a man
(John 1:1, 14) in order to die in their place, so that they might
not perish eternally but might receive eternal life (John 3:16;
Matthew 20:28). For a man to receive eternal life he must be
''born again" (John 3:3) by committing his life to Jesus
(John 1:12; cf. Revelation 3:20).
Jesus' disregard for their minute regulations (for example,
prohibiting healing on the Sabbath) aroused the opposition of
the Pharisees, the most respected religious leaders among the
Jews. Jesus strongly denounced the hypocrisy of these antagonists.
Even at the time of his greatest popularity Jesus told his disciples
that he would be condemned to death, crucified and resurrected
(Mark 8:31; 9:31; 10:33-34).
DEATH
Zoroaster According to Al-Biruni (A.D. 973-1048) Zoroaster
was killed by invading Turanians. The Shah Namah (c.
A.D. 1000) describes the event:
And all before the Fire the Turkmans
slew
And swept that cult away. The Fire, that
erst
Zardusht [Zoroaster] had litten, of their
blood did die;
Who slew that priest himself I know not.
Buddha In his eightieth year as he traveled near Benares,
Buddha became mortally ill after a meal of pork, perhaps from
dysentary [sic]. According to the Mahaparanibbana Sutta
his last words to a disciple were these:
I have reached my sum of days
. It is only, Ananda, when
the Tathagata [a title of Buddha] ceasing to attend to any outward
thing, or to experience any sensation,becomes plunged in that
devout meditation of the heart which is concerned with no material
object - it is only then that the body of the Tathagata is at
ease.
Elsewhere in this sutta the Buddha is said to have added,
"Therefore, O Ananda, be ye lamps unto yourselves. Be ye
a refuge to yourselves. Betake yourselves to no external refuge.
Hold fast to the truth as a lamp." After his death Buddha
was cremated and his ashes distributed among eight cities. His
alleged remains are venerated at various stupas, or shrines,
throughout Asia.
Socrates Socrates was brought to trial in 399 B.C.
on charges of "atheism" and corrupting Athenian youth.
This arraignment had at least two immediate causes: a political
reaction which occurred in Athens after a lengthy war with Sparta
and the lampoons of the comic writer Aristophanes. Though Socrates
eloquently defended himself (the defense is recorded in Plato's
Apology), the jury voted 281 to 220 to put him to death.
Socrates could easily have fled from Athens after the trial,
but he chose to remain. He said he did not fear dying because
it would bring either annihilation or a welcome opportunity to
fellowship with those already dead. At the appointed time Socrates
calmly drank the poisonous hemlock. According to the Phaedo,
his last words were: "I owe a cock to Asclepius [the god
of healing]; do not forget to pay it."
Muhammad In 632 Muhammad became ill with violent headaches
and a fever. Before he died the prophet exhorted the Arabs to
remain united, proclaimed the duties of married couples and abolished
usury and the blood feud. When he announced that if he owed anything
to anyone that person could claim it, a hush fell on the crowd.
One man came forward to claim a few coins. Muhammad finally succumbed
and was buried in the house of his wife A'isha, who had nursed
him during his last days. The prophet's tomb at Medina is, after
Mecca, the site most venerated by Muslims.
Jesus When Jesus was given a tumultuous welcome into
Jerusalem on Palm Sunday, the chief priests and other leaders
of the Jews conspired with Judas Iscariot, one of Jesus' own
apostles, to arrest him. He finally was arrested on
Thursday night (early Friday morning by Jewish reckoning) in
a garden where he was praying with his disciples. After preliminary
examinations during the night by Annas the high priest emeritus
(John 18), by Caiaphas the high priest (Mark 14; Matthew 26;
and Luke 22) and by part of the Sanhedrin (the ruling assembly
of the Jews), Jesus was taken early in the morning to the Roman
governor Pontius Pilate and accused of misleading the Jewish
nation, forbidding the payment of taxes to Rome and claiming
to be a king (Luke 23:2).(15)
Though he judged Jesus to be innocent, Pilate had him scourged
and crucified to placate a mob which had gathered and been stirred
up by the Jewish leaders (Matthew 27:20; Mark 15:11). Though
Jesus suffered humiliation and excruciating pain on the cross,
he asked God to forgive those who were responsible (Luke 23:34).
That "Good Friday," as the Sabbath approached, (16) the Roman soldiers hastened the deaths
of the brigands with whom Jesus was crucified by breaking their
legs. They made certain Jesus was already dead by thrusting a
spear in his side.
The body of Jesus was buried by Joseph of Arimathea in an
unused tomb which was carved into a rock. A large circular stone
was rolled in front of the entrance and Roman soldiers were posted
there (Matthew 27:62-66). When some women disciples came to the
tomb early on Sunday morning to complete the anointing of Jesus'
body, however, they discovered the soldiers gone, the stone rolled
away and the tomb empty. Upon hearing the report of this, John
and Peter raced to the tomb (John 20) and discovered all that
remained in the tomb was Jesus' grave clothes, neatly in place
(evidence, by the way, which speaks against a tomb robbery).
The empty tomb alone did not convince the disciples that Jesus
was alive, but Jesus appeared to his disciples on at least ten
occasions after that. All of these appearances are recorded in
the New Testament; we will mention just four of them.
Jesus first appeared to Mary Magdalene on Sunday morning near
the tomb. The other disciples did not believe her report (John
20:18; Mark 16:11). Then that evening in Jerusalem Jesus suddenly
appeared in the midst of the disciples, who had barricaded themselves
behind locked doors. After allowing the terrified men to touch
him and examine his wounds to prove he was not an apparition,
he ate a meal with them (John 20:19; Luke 24:39, 43). He also
appeared to a multitude of his disciples on a mountain in Galilee
(Matthew 28:16-18) and in Jerusalem before his ascension (Luke
24:44-49); Acts 1).
Some time later Saul of Tarsus, on his way from Jerusalem
to Damascus to persecute the Christians there, encountered the
risen Jesus (Acts 9). This transformed Saul, a fanatical persecutor
of Christianity, into Paul, a fervent propagator of Christianity.
(17)
RELATION TO DEITY
Zoroaster It seems that Zoroaster preached the monotheistic
worship of Ahura Mazda, who was the creator of two other spirits
- one good, the other evil. (18) Classical
dualistic Zoroastrianism, which pitted Ahura Mazda against the
evil Ahriman, developed in the Sassanian period (A.D. 226-652).
Later Zoroastrianism also developed a doctrine of a Saoshyan
(Savior) who would raise the dead. According to Jacques Duchesne-Guillemin:
Zoroaster did not give himself out to be the redeemer. When
his prayers call the redeemer who is to renew existence, he means
the prince who shall accept his doctrine and realize the Dominion
of Righteousness and Good Mind. He even allows the role of redeemer
to any man, provided he practises righteousness. (19)
Buddha Although it is not correct to speak of Buddhism
as an "atheistic" religion, it is a religion whose
chief focus is on man rather than on any god. The Buddhist
Annual of Ceylon defines Buddhism as "that religion
which without starting with a God leads man to a stage where
God's help is not necessary." Buddha himself, coming out
of a background of polytheistic Hinduism, seems to have treated
even Brahma, one of the highest of the gods, with a cool superciliousness.
Junjiro Takakusu of Tokyo University explains that "the
Buddha did not deny the existence of gods (Devas), but he considered
them only as the higher grade of living beings, also to be taught
by him." (20)
It is clear that over the centuries the original concept of
Buddha as an enlightened man was radically changed so that "he
was no longer that simple teacher of moral values but a Mahapurisa
[a super-human being], greater than the gods themselves."
(21) Transformations in Buddhist
art reveal this evolution in doctrine. From the third to the
first centuries B.C. Buddha was depicted in Indian art simply
by a symbol, such as his footprint, umbrella or throne. (22) Thereafter the Buddha himself is depicted.
According to Mortimer Wheeler, "It was no less fitting to
represent the deified Buddha than to embody the traditional divinities
of the Hindu pantheon." (23)
By the second and third centuries A.D. Mahayana Buddhism had
produced a doctrine of Boddhisatvas, innumerable perfected Buddhas
distributed through space and time who help mankind by their
merits. According to the Lotus of the True Law the Buddha
was an eternal sublime being, who appeared in human form as the
savior of mankind.
Socrates Though Socrates did not fully subscribe to
the anthropomorphic Homeric deities, he was deeply devout in
his own way. He was scrupulously obedient to his daimonion,
a personal guiding spirit. In Xenophon's Apology, Socrates
says, "As for introducing 'new divinities', how can I be
guilty of that merely in asserting that a voice of God is made
manifest to me indicating my duty?" In his Memorabilia
Xenophon asserts, "For myself, I have described him as he
was: so religious that he did nothing without counsel from the
gods
."
Muhammad The Qur'an emphatically stresses the Oneness
of the Godhead, not only to deny polytheism but also to refute
the Christian Trinity. Qur'an 112:1-4 reads:
Say: He is Allah, the One!
Allah, the eternally Besought of all!
He begetteth not nor was begotten.
And there is none comparable unto Him.
Muhummad himself did not claim to be anything other than a
mortal messenger (Qur'an 7:188; 17:95). On one occasion he is
said to have exclaimed: "O, God! I am but a man. If I hurt
anyone in any manner, then forgive me and do not punish me."
His fallibility is shown in the Qur'an, surah 80, where Allah
rebukes him for turning away from a blind man.
Nor did Muhammad claim he had the power to save others. According
to a tradition reported by Athar Husain, Muhammad said:
O People of Quraish be prepared for the Hereafter.
I cannot save you from the punishment of God, O Bani Abd Manaf
.
I cannot
protect you either, O Safia, aunt of the Prophet,
I cannot be of help to you; O Fatima, daughter of Muhammad, even
you I
cannot save. (24)
When Muhammad died, Abu Bakr, who was to be one of the succeeding
caliphs, announced: "O men, whosoever worshipped Muhammad,
know that he is dead; whoever worshipped Muhammad's God, know
that He is alive and immortal."
Jesus Unlike the other spiritual leaders we are examining,
Jesus came out of a monotheistic culture. The concept of "gods"
in polytheistic religions is quite anthropomorphic; there is
no sharp difference in kind between men and such gods.(25)
In Jewish monotheism the distinction between God as transcendent
and infinite and man as finite is almost absolute.
It is therefore altogether remarkable that Jesus claimed to
be one with the Father (John 10:30), a blasphemy for which the
Jews wished to stone him (John 10:31, 33: John 5:17-18). This
claim to be one with God was expressed in Jesus' claims to be
free from sin (John 8:46), to be the only way to the Father (John
14:6), to have authority to forgive sins (Matthew 9:5-6) and
to have the right to demand complete loyalty (Luke 14:26). He
accepted worship (John 20:28; Matthew 28:9; Luke 24:52; contrast
the refusal to accept any adoration by Peter, Acts 3:12; 10:25-26;
and by Barnabas and Paul, Acts 14:14-15) and believed he deserved
equal honor with God the Father (John 5:23). Jesus dared to address
God as Abba, an intimate Aramaic term for "father,"
which none of the rabbis used. As Joachim Jeremias has noted,
"
this Abba implies the claim of a unique revelation
and a unique authority." (26)
It is sometimes suggested that the deity of Jesus is a late
doctrine, imported into Christianity by pagan converts.(27) This thesis cannot be maintained in light
of the declarations of the apostle Paul, a converted Pharisaic
Jew. (28)
CONCLUSIONS
As we review the data, we see that these important men do
share some characteristics.
(1) They all preached against the corruption of contemporary
religion. (2) They all perceived keenly the needs of their fellowmen.
(3) They all were so gripped by personal convictions that they
tried to transmit to others what they believed to be true, even
though attempting this often aroused opposition and caused them
to suffer. (4) Each man's deeds and words have attracted admirers
and followers who have extended his impact over many continents
and through many centuries.
To maintain that each of these leaders is equivalent, however,
is to argue not from tolerance but from ignorance. Each one had
his own distinctive message and mission. And in comparing Jesus
with Zoroaster, Buddha, Socrates and Muhammad, we discover a
number of unique features in Jesus' life and ministry.
First, only Jesus came out of a culture which was already
monotheistic.
Second, his death by crucifixion is unique. G. Bernard Shaw
once remarked rather cynically: "These refined people worship
Jesus and take comparatively no account of Socrates and Mahomet,
for no discoverable reason except that Jesus was horribly tortured,
and Socrates humanely drugged, whilst Mahomet died unsensationally
in his bed." (29)
On the other hand, Jean-Jacques Rousseau in "Profession
de foi du vicaire Savoyard, " Emile, wrote:
What prejudices, what blindness it takes to compare the son
of Sophroniscus with the son of Mary! What distance between the
two! Socrates, dying without pain, without disgrace, maintained
his character easily to the end
. The death of Socrates,
philosophizing quietly with his friends, is the sweetest that
one could desire; that of Jesus expiring under tortures, injured,
ridiculed, cursed by his entire people, is the most horrible
that one might dread
. Indeed, if the life and death of
Socrates are those of a sage, the life and death of Jesus are
those of a god.
But Jesus' death on the cross is unique not only in its manner
but also in its alleged redemptive meaning. Neither Zoroaster,
Buddha, Socrates nor Muhammad claimed his death would save men
from their sins.
Third, if we exclude later legendary and apologetic accounts,
we find that early accounts attribute miracles only to Jesus.
Fourth, only Jesus spoke on his own unquestioned authority.
Zoroaster and Muhammad acted as spokesmen for God, while Socrates
and Buddha urged every man to consult his own conscience.
Fifth, only Jesus predicted he would be resurrected after
his death, and only his followers rest their faith on such an
event.
Sixth, only Jesus claimed equality with a sole, supreme deity.
According to E.O. James, an authority on comparative religions,
"Nowhere else had it ever been claimed that a historical
founder of any religion was the one and only supreme deity." (30)
Now one may argue that Jesus was a deceiver, though few have
made that charge. Or one may choose to believe with G. Bernard
Shaw that Christ was sincere but deluded:
Whether you believe with the evangelists that Christ could
have rescued himself by a miracle, or, as a modern Secularist,
point out that he could have defended himself effectually, the
fact remains that according to all the narratives he did not
do so
. The consensus on this point is important, because
it proves the absolute sincerity of Jesus's declaration that
he was a god. No impostor would have accepted such dreadful consequences
without an effort to save himself. No impostor would have been
nerved to endure them by the conviction that he would rise from
the grave and live again after three days. (31)
C.S. Lewis says Jesus' claim to be equal with deity leaves
us only one other choice:
A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus
said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a
lunatic on a level with the man who says he is a poached
egg or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make
your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or
else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool,
you can spit at Him and kill Him as a demon; or you can fall
at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with
any patronising nonsense about His being a great human teacher.
He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to. (32)
Notes
- 1. Walter Lippman,
A Preface to Morals (1929), p. 155.
- 2. Arnold J.
Toynbee, Civilization on Trial (1948), p. 156.
- 3. Christmas
Humphreys, Buddhism (1955), p. 14.
- 4. M. Winternitz,
"Gotama the Buddha, What Do We Know of Him and His Teaching?"
Archiv Orientalni, I (1929), 235.
- 5. Cf. Anton-Hermann
Chroust, Socrates Man and Myth (1957).
- 6. Jose O'Callaghan,
Biblica, 53 (1972), 91-100 has identified a Greek fragment
from Cave VII at Qumran as a manuscript of Mark dates c. A.D.
50 although most scholars have questioned his readings and rejected
his identification.
- 7. F.F. Bruce,
The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? (1960), p. 12.
- 8. W.F. Albright,
New Horizons in Biblical Research (1966), p. 46; Leon
Morris, Commentary on the Gospel of John (1971), pp. 34-35.
- 9. Cf. P. Winter,
"Josephus on Jesus," Journal of Historical Studies,
I (1968), 289-302. In 1971 Professor Shlomo Pines of the Hebrew
University in Jerusalem translated a tenth-century A.D. Arabic
manuscript which contains a version of Josephus's passage which
he believes represents the original uninterpolated text. The
Arabic text reads in part: "At this time there was a wise
man who was called Jesus. His conduct was good, and [he] was
known to be virtuous. And many people from among the Jews and
the other nations became his disciples
. They [his disciples]
reported that he had appeared to them three days after his crucifixion
and that he was alive; accordingly he was perhaps the Messiah
concerning whom the prophets have recounted wonders." S.
Pines, An Arabic Version of the Testimonium Flavianum and
Its Implications (1971), pp. 9-10.
- 10. Cf. A.
Helmbold, The Nag Hammadi Gnostic Texts and the Bible
(1967).
- 11. Cf. M.R.
James, The Apocryphal New Testament (1924).
- 12. A point
which should be neither overstressed nor ignored is the fact
that Socratic love, as discussed in Plato's Symposium,
was a type of idealistic pederasty or homosexual love in which
an older man sought to instruct and inspire a younger man. Cf.
H.I. Marrou, A History of Education in Antiquity (1964),
pp. 50-59.
- 13. Francesco
Gabrielli, Muhammad and the Conquests of Islam (1968),
p. 11.
- 14. Bruce,
p. 62.
- 15. Cf. Edwin
Yamauchi, "Historical Notes on the Trial and Crucifixion
of Jesus Christ," Christianity Today, XV (April 9,
1971), 6-11.
- 16. The Jews
reckoned the beginning of the Sabbath from sundown on Friday.
- 17. For a further
discussion of the evidences, see J.N.D. Anderson, The Evidence
for the Resurrection (1965); Frank Morison, Who Moved
the Stone? (1930).
- 18. Cf. R.
C. Zaehner, The Dawn and Twilight of Zoroastrianism (1961).
- 19. Jacques
Duchesne-Guillemin, The Hymns of Zoroaster (1963), p.
19.
- 20. Cited in
F.H. Hilliard, The Buddha, the Prophet and the Christ
(1956), p. 60.
- 21. B.G. Gokhale,
"The Theravada-Buddhist View of History," Journal
of the American Oriental Society, LXXXV (1965), 359-60.
22.Tamara T. Rice, Ancient Arts of Central Asia
(1965), p. 150.
- 23. Mortimer
Wheeler, Flames over Persepolis (1968), p. 163.
- 24. Athar Husain,
Prophet Muhammad and His Mission (1967), p. 128.
- 25. Cf. Edwin
Yamauchi, "Anthropomorphism in Ancient Religions,"
Bibliotheca Sacra, CXXV (1968), 29-44.
- 26. Joachim
Jeremias, The Central Message of the New Testament (1965),
pp. 29ff.
- 27. For example,
H.J. Schonfield, The Passover Plot (1966), pp. 21, 200.
Cf. the writer's review in The Gordon Review, X (1967),
150-60; also reprinted in the Journal of the American Scientific
Affiliation, XXI (1969), 27-32.
- 28. H.J. Schoeps,
Paul: The Theology of the Apostle in the Light of Jewish Religious
History (1961), pp. 152, 158.
- 29. G. Bernard
Shaw, Everybody's Political What's What (1944), p. 129.
- 30. E.O. James,
Christianity and Other Religions (1968), p. 170.
- 31. G. Bernard
Shaw, Androcles and the Lion (1951), p. 50. First published
1913.
- 32. C.S. Lewis,
Mere Christianity (1955), pp. 52-53.
|