|
|
|
The Masonic Secret: Pages 45-52: In this work of subversion, Freemasonry undertakes three tasks which represents three successive steps towards the final objective. The first step is the work inside the lodges. Freemasonry gradually steeps its initiates in Masonic principles and ideas. It is a more subtle equivalent of Communist brainwashing techniques. The brethren formed in this way comprise groups active outside the lodges. Secondly is the work of propaganda in the outside world. Freemasonry has perfected a very effective technique of occult propaganda in the world at large, which consists in spreading and imposing Masonic ideals outside the lodges, without revealing the secret source from which these currents originate. As one of the speakers at the 1922 Convent of the Grand Orient expressed it, "Masonry should be felt everywhere, but nowhere should its face be unveiled". It consists in spreading belief in the natural, inevitable and irresistible evolution of human progress. The third step towards the final objective is in the field of political activity. The ideological propaganda, as described above, runs parallel with the political conspiracy, whose object is to seize power and place Freemasons in positions of command. As far as possible, the public is not to know that they are Masons. All this vast field of activity is protected by two secrets: the esoteric secret inside the Masonic lodges; and the secret political action outside the lodges. Let us now pass on to study the nature of the esoteric secret. In the first stage, new members are attracted by Freemasonry's generous and humanitarian professions of faith, and also by promises of influence and concealed assistance. Candidates are carefully chosen and thoroughly vetted long before they are even approached. When they are received into the lodge, they are made to take an oath of secrecy, which is renewed every time they advance to a higher degree. At this point commences the second stage in the candidate's formation; as soon as he has become a Mason, a process of doctrinal formation (or brainwashing) begins, which will continue all his life. The statements of principle are cleverly worded in vague, generous, humanitarian terms which can be interpreted in many very different ways. Cautiously, and by easy stages, a neophyte learns that these terms have a hidden meaning, a higher meaning, which he will not understand until he has undergone further initiation. In this way, he learns, one by one, of a succession of hidden meanings, which he is told are an ascent towards the Light, and in which he gradually becomes steeped. This is the purpose of the succession of different degrees; if the Mason is receptive, he climbs upward in the Masonic hierarchy, and yet he never at any time knows exactly where he stands in it, nor how many higher degrees or persons control the organisation. As in the secret Communist organisation, one is never very sure whether the titular degrees correspond to the real seat of power. Freemasonry is therefore in a sense a succession of secret societies superimposed on one another, whose mode of operation has been slowly laid bare, at least in broad outline, by a series of patient investigators; nevertheless, it remains unknown to the public at large and, all in all, continues to be very effective. To justify the above statements, here are a few Masonic texts
emanating from highly-placed dignitaries in the Order, who themselves
admit to being initiates at a high level. "The method in question (of Freemasonry) is that of initiation;
the usage and practice is that of allegory and symbol, which
it is the Freemason's duty, if he wishes to understand his system,
to labour to interpret and to put to personal interpretation.
If he fails to do so, he still remainsand the system deliberately
intends that he shouldin the dark about the Order's real
meaning and secrets, although formerly a member of it."
(W. L. Wilmshurst : The Masonic Initiation, 1957, PP- 4-5)
"We profess to confer initiation, but few Masons know
what real initiation involves; very few, one fears, would have
the wish, the courage, or the willingness to make the necessary
sacrifices to attain it if they did." ( W. L. Wilmshurst,
ibid., p. 17) "When Freemasonry, or for that matter any other confraternity
based on initiation, prides itself on its impenetrable veil of
secrecy, it is not a case of the transferable but of the intelligible
content of the mysteries. One can divulge only the dead letter,
not the spirit, which of its own accord reveals itself to those
who are privileged to understand. Thus, there is a secret theology in Freemasonry, to use the
trenchant expression of Rabbi Benamozegh, in his book Israel
et l'Humanité, and in this context he is in full agreement
with the Masonic writers from whom we have just quoted, whether
French, like Oswald Wirth, English, like Wilmshurst, or American,
like Albert Pike; whether "regular" or "irregular",
to use Mr. Mellor's terms. Finally, we come to the third stage in the work of Masonry, that of its direct intervention in politics. This is how Leo XIII described it in his Encyclical of 19th
March, 1902: It is instructive, in this context, to compare the conclusion
of the famous Pope with the following passages from the equally
renowned Freemason, Oswald Wirth: "If at these moments of civil distress, the lodges had limited themselves to what we may call their normal peacetime occupation, they would have failed in their most sacred duty, for they would have been refusing to defend that heritage of liberties conquered by our valiant ancestors. It is to their honour that they have broken their rule, launching themselves with all haste into the political arena. They formed themselves into electoral committees to save the Republic, forgetful for the moment of that lofty humanitarian philosophy whose cultivation is the basic aim of Freemasonry." (O. Wirth : L'Idéal Initiatique, p. 82) Freemasonry has played a leading part in international politics, and especially in all the revolutionary movements which have shaken Europe and the world since 1789: in 1830, 1848, and 1871 in France; in 1848 and 1917 elsewhere in Europe, to mention only the most important instances. Freemasonry boasts of having been both the inspiration and the secret ruler of the Third Republic in France (1870-1939), and it is Freemasonry which has always been in the vanguard of the struggle against the Catholic Church in France, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Austriaor, in a word, wherever the Church was the religion of the country. We do not propose to re-write that history here, nor even to summarise Freemasonry's political activities; we only mention it to remind the reader that this is a factor which must be taken into account. (For a complete study of this question, see Leon de Poncins : The Secret Powers behind Revolution.) But one point which we must emphasise in this context is the secrecy surrounding all these activities. Freemasonry is practically never mentioned in the Press; history books are silent about the power and influence of the Order, and governments and parliaments never dare debate such a dangerous subject. Reports of Masonic meetings and Congresses are not available to the public; Masonic magazines and publications are not placed in the Bibliothéque Nationale or the British Museum, although the law of the land demands it. In general, we can say that Freemasonry has succeeded in keeping its political activities secret. But no secret can be kept indefinitely, and it is nearly always possible to discover the Masonic origins of such and such a political decisiononly by that time it is usually too late to hinder it. We have chosen the following examples from history to illustrate this point: The peace treaty of 1918 was directly inspired by Masonry. Its clauses had been worked out at a great international Masonic conference which took place on 28th, 29th and 30th June, 1917, at the headquarters of the Grand Orient of France in the Rue Cadet, Paris. This conference was attended by representatives of the leading lodges of allied and neutral countriesItaly, Switzerland, Belgium, Serbia, Spain, Portugal, Argentina, Brazil, the United States (whence two lodges in Arkansas and Ohio, unrepresented, sent cordial greetings) and so on; only the Grand Lodge of England was unrepresented. In 1936 the complete minutes of this meeting came to light and were published in their entirety, accompanied by a detailed commentary, in Leon de Poncin's : La Société des Nations-SuperEtat Mgonnique, from which all the information and documents in the following paragraphs have been taken. Preparations for the Congress in June were put in hand at
an earlier one in January 1917, as the minutes of the subsequent
meeting relate: "The object of this Congress will be to investigate the means of elaborating the Constitution of the League of Nations, so as to prevent the recurrence of a catastrophe similar to the one at present raging which has plunged the civilised world in mourning. "It was the opinion of this conference that this programme cannot be discussed solely by the Freemasonry of the Allied Nations, and that it is a matter also for the Masonic bodies of the neutral nations to bring what light they can to the discussion of so grave a problem. . . . "It is the duty of Freemasonry at the close of the cruel drama now being played out, to make its great and humanitarian voice heard, and to guide the nations towards a general organisation which will become their safeguard. It would be wanting in its duty, and false to its great principles, were it to remain silent. . . . "It is clearly understood that the Masonic Congress will confine itself entirely to the humanitarian field, and that, in conformity with our Masonic Constitutions, it will not touch on any question of a political nature. "We would be very grateful to receive from you the assurance of your support with the least possible delay. . . ." (Leon de Poncins; La Société
des Nations, pp. 65-67) |
|
|