It seems like the wrong time to expose how the Council On Foreign Relations uses discord and deceit to push through its murderous Israeli agenda. After all, this week it's Europe's turn to get Israel. The EU's foreign ministers, led by the German cutthroat Joschka Fischer will meet in Brussels and reward the PLO for its unrelenting slaughter with a state. I had prepared an article called The Astonishing Secrets Of Europe's Plot Against Israel as a prelude to the meeting. Included within was Fischer's order to PM Sharon not to retaliate after the Dolphinarium blast, which murdered twenty young people down the block from his Tel Aviv hotel last summer. But we'll get to Fischer and Europe in the next installment, once my readers absorb the reality of the upcoming European plans for Israel. Instead, circumstances call for an expose of the CFR's use of disinformation, because I'm a victim of it and I'm getting quite tired of it all. In my case, the 3800 member Manhattan think tank is using its pawns to denigrate me in the American right wing Jewish community, as illustrated by an attack which was just published in the magazine outlet of Americans For A Safe Israel.

The attack is pathetic and utilizes the same stupid arguments the attackers have used for the past two years. Conspiracy theories against Jews and Israel are all wrong, therefore there could not have been a conspiracy to murder Yitzhak Rabin. I have written about weird subjects therefore I have no credibility. And my expose of Rabin's murder has no evidence to back it up. False claims all of them and, as always, not many readers will be fooled. Here is how such a campaign of discordant falsehood is organized. You start with one CFR member Richard Pipes, who is not just any old CIA employee but past head of the CIA's Soviet research department. The apple falls right by the tree as his son, CFR member Daniel Pipes receives slightly indirect CFR funding to run a "think" tank in Philadelphia, serving CFR interests. In the recent past, D. Pipes has been called upon to neutralize "conspiracy" theories and he wrote inferior articles resulting in an inferior book on the subject.

Today, his role is to spread hatred against Islam, while his CFR superiors publicly profess no objection to the religion as they blow Afghanistan to smithereens and draw up battle plans to capture the Middle East. Pipes has attacked my work in his institute's barely-read journal but the real work has been passed to a buddy of his, an unknown economics teacher based in Haifa. Numerous readers have sent me background on this creep, and he's just as tied up with the ruling establishment as his mentor. He was trained, groomed and financed by the American Federal Reserve, and apparently sent to Israel in the 80s to instill that peculiar globalist economic theory that insists local economies must be "reformed" through "liberalization," or in short, local industries must be wrecked in order to make way for American corporations. But as a former colleague of his explained, "He got nowhere.

People in his field saw him as a screwball whose ideas were off the wall. He was dismissed as irrelevant ten years ago." Trying to be known for something, he is a willing partner in the smear campaign against me. Yes, he is an infiltrator sowing discord among right wing American Jews. And he's not the only one. Others have made the same claim against one Murray Kahl, whose role seems to be the venting of Jewish anger towards harmless issues. So let us counterattack against infiltration with a simply amazing piece of evidence given to me last week by the director of the Root And Branch Society, Aryeh Gallin. Up until now, the best proof of the CFR's nefarious Israeli agenda was their Middle East Task Force Report of July, 1997, which, in barely couched terms, called for Israel's withdrawal to its 1948 borders and the division of Jerusalem.

That task force was headed by one Henry Seigman, who receives $200,000 a year from the EU to spread anti-Israel disinformation in the world media. That fact was intended for my Astonishing EU Secrets article but let's let one cat out of the bag early. Now, we have in hand an even more detailed proof of CFR chicanery against Israel in the form of a whole study called A Changing Israel by Peter Grose - A Council On Foreign Relations Book. This book was published by Vintage Books in 1984. It is a CFR policy book and thereafter became the official diplomacy of such CFR members as James Baker, George Shultz, Warren Christopher, Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright. Like all CFR publications, it tries hard to appear to be balanced but upon, even the most cursory reading, comes up a transparent piece of deception.

The author's method is to relay his views and those of his CFR bosses, through the quotes of others, almost always anonymously. Look at the claims of the preface: "The author of this book, director of the Council's Middle East program, visited Israel twice during the study to confirm facts and impressions... A generous grant from the Ford Foundation underwrote the costs of bringing Israeli discussion leaders to this country...The groups were deliberately diverse..." Diverse? A list of some fifty discussion leaders follows. I saw one name that I recognized as a right wing leader, Eliahu Ben Elissar, who was assassinated in Paris a few years ago.

All the rest were of the likes of Meron Benvenesti, recipient of Ford Foundation money during this period to head a West Bank anti-settlement watchdog group: Arthur Hertzberg, a rabbi and partner of CFR member Charles Bronfman, best known in certain circles for their work with the UN to spread a one world religion; Samuel Lewis, the former American ambassador to Israel and recent signer of a petition less than indirectly supporting Arafat's regime of terror; Itamar Rabinovich, the Israeli diplomat who negotiated away the Golan Heights to Syria; and a man who needs no introduction in war-torn former Yugoslavia or anywhere, Cyrus Vance.

Of the Vance connection, let's look at the author's short biography: "Peter Grose is managing editor of Foreign Affairs and a Senior Fellow of the Council On Foreign Relations. A longtime correspondent for the New York Times; he was bureau chief in Moscow, Israel and at the United Nations and later served on the Policy Planning Staff of the State Department under Cyrus Vance." Now let us look at this study and get a rare glimpse at the CFR's Israeli agenda.

If you are a member of any political group from Labor to its left, you are described as "thoughtful" or at the worst, "dovish." Take a gander at the adjectives if you are not:

"Those espousing the more militant ideologies of the Likud...allowed adventurist leaders to pursue a ruinous, inflationary economic policy..." pp 4

"They told me their dismay over the hard-line policies of the Likud government...and the danger for the future survival of Israel." pp 6-7

"...the fanatic rabbi Meir Kahane, considered an abomination by moderate Israelis." pp 9

"As Begin's rhetoric unfolded, his dogmatic assertions about Jewish rights and Arab perfidy sounded clear and satisfying (to Sephardi Jews)." pp 28 But the good news is that, "Sephardi soldiers returned from the 1982 invasion of Lebanon expressing the same disgust as their Ashkenazi partners." pp 40

"Gaining strength along with this generalized rediscovery of Jewish roots was its extremist expression..." pp 44

"Secular Israelis are troubled by the appeal of the narrow, traditionally religious Jewish radicals, particularly to the young." pp 127

There you have it. Israelis to the right of Labor are all extremists and endanger Israel's future. Of course, Grose could not have known that the people who would eventually endanger Israel's future are the "moderates" of Labor-left who brought us the dubious gifts of the CFR's Oslo "peace" process eight years later. After all, Grose, was merely a tool, preparing the ground for later public acceptance of Oslo. Or maybe, he actually knew what he was doing, which means he is personally responsible for thousands of Jewish and Arab casualties.

Sharon's CFR ties have previously been examined in depth. They began in 1974 with a meeting between him and Henry Kissinger. His role was to infiltrate and destroy the Herut movement and he succeeded nearly completely. However, according to this study, Sharon rebelled against the CFR in 1982 with his Lebanon policies. I would take the following passages with a grain of salt and consider the likelihood that Sharon was actually pursuing the war the way his masters desired. Nonetheless, examine the CFR's attitude to the current prime minister in light of his impotence to protect his people.

"Dissent reached a critical level over the military campaign in Lebanon, a war undertaken at Israel's initiative, under dubious political controls and for aims far broader than merely to counter any immediate threats to the life of the population." pp 90. So while Grose conveniently forgets that a constant barrage of Katyushas threatening lives, along with a series of terror attacks from Lebanon, taking lives, was the prime reason for the Lebanese invasion, it offers him the opportunity to go for Sharon's jugular.

"The political leadership, supposedly operating under a system of collective responsibility, was manipulated during the weeks of combat by one member, Defense Minister Ariel Sharon. Begin and his colleagues were kept substantially in the dark about crucial military decisions until it was too late to alter them." pp 92. On this point we agree, the difference is my claim that one of Sharon's goals was to destroy Begin and his Herut movement through his conduct of the war; a pre-agreed CFR policy. This is the belief, minus the CFR, of Begin's son, Binyamin. Still, Grose's wrath knows no bounds when it comes to Sharon's doctrine of defense.

"Sharon's bold strategic doctrine rested on four premises: - The concept of strategic defense aimed at altering the political status quo on Israel's borders, was to replace the longstanding posture which had been intended to maintain the status quo. - Military operations were to be initiated whenever targets of opportunity presented themselves; national survival required the dulling of enemy capabilities. - Tsahal's central mission was to keep hostile forces off balance by initiating anti-terrorist operations, rather than maintaining a defensive stance to counter basic threats to the Jewish state. - The government was to maintain the capability to make strategic decisions quickly, based on the judgments of the responsible military and security officers, without necessarily seeking national consensus... "For all the traumas of Lebanon, the Sharon doctrine is not universally discredited, particularly among the hard-line extremists who registered such a strong showing in the 1984 election. Sharon is not spent as a political force...Israelis pride themselves on greater sensitivity to casualties than Arabs, but the offensive operations called for under Sharon would inevitably produce higher casualties." pp 99-100

"Military cooperation would grow less defensible in Washington, of course, were Israel to continue the adventurist, military policies of the Sharon doctrine." pp 116

Imagine the nerve of this Sharon! He actually favored taking out Israel's enemies before they murder Israelis. Well, the CFR had to put a stop to this. And they did. Sharon has a thousand more reasons to invade the PLO Authority than he ever did to enter Lebanon but he is incapable of acting. His CFR masters clearly wouldn't like it if he did and one can only imagine what is making him obey them. Meanwhile, the CFR restraint option is producing the desired effect; Israeli casualties are far higher than would have been if the so-called intifada had been forcefully nipped in the bud the minute the Israeli public gave Sharon the mandate to do so. The Grose book states without hesitation or shame that the CFR would never allow Sharon again to change the status quo through pre-emptive strikes. From now on, Sharon could only react and retaliate, and moderately at that, thus turning Israelis into the sitting ducks of the CFR.

Of all the self-serving chutzpah seen in various CFR publications, none is more outstanding than Grose's total denial that international forces are coordinating the Middle East violence. Forget that after Word War 1, the CFR and their British buddies created the new Middle East. Forget that Labor Zionism was their creation, as was the never before heard of Palestinian Arab nation. Why recall that their oil companies run Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States and placed the Hussein clan in power in Jordan and Iraq? Absolutely incredibly, Grose denies that the current conflict is being manipulated by the very forces he works for and this lie may have been a primary motive for his book. However, this claim is so shabby and shallow that he contradicts it more often than he supports it. Watch the argument break down before your eyes.

"For generations the people on both sides have deceived themselves into supposing that the conflict was external to themselves, the clash of foreign forces...A quite different prospect could emerge if the two sides recognized how mutually destructive that portrayal has been through the twentieth century. Forces external to Palestine have clearly manipulated the rivalry of the two claimants to the land, but can it honestly be said that the rivalry originates with outsiders? Israelis and Palestinians might well consider the hypothesis that they only have themselves to reckon with." pp 79

"Looking upon the Arab-Israeli reality in this new light, as an internal conflict, the concerned outsider can be excused for feeling like a latter-day Dr. Zhivago, watching a revolution that passed him by. Ideologues on all sides continue to bewail the malignant influence of external forces on Arab-Israeli relations...Problems could always be blamed on external forces intent on stirring up trouble." pp 87,88

Now watch Grose cut his own ridiculous thesis into pieces before your unbelieving eyes.

"The policy of the British Mandate administration starting in the 1920s, underscored the two communities' habits of separate development. The Mandate was committed to 'putting into effect the Balfour Declaration and to establishing a Jewish Agency' which would represent 'all the Jews' the world over. Externalization was thus enshrined in international law." pp 80

"The only outlet for national expression was within the new diaspora of Palestinian refugees, with its strange mixture of internationally supported charities and its obsessive military structure."

Nosiree. Those British and those international charities aren't initiating trouble in the Middle East. Nobody outside the region would want to do that. After all, what's there to gain by constant conflict except control of the region and all its resources?

THE CFR'S ISRAELI AGENDA EXPOSED AND IT'S ABOUT TIME IT WAS UNDERSTOOD

The importance of the Grose book is that it exposes the CFR's plans from the 1980s. Look how they all came to fruition in the 1990s and then realize that they and the State Department they control are directly and deliberately responsible for the slow bleeding death of Israel at the start of the new century.

"The state of the Israeli economy is no longer a purely internal matter left to Israeli politicians. It is increasingly the American Treasury that underwrites the economic priorities defined in Jerusalem. This is a situation calling for serious, quiet professional dialogue among friends, and with Shimon Peres' visit to Washington, the dialogue has begun." pp 70

"It is the attitudes in Washington that do the most to assure the security and well-being of the people and land of Israel." pp 111

"Israelis have not found the costs of territorial expansion too high a price to pay. This could change if the Arabs within Israeli jurisdiction become restive or if the financial burden of developing Jewish life in Judea and Samaria starts to divert too much of the national treasure away from social needs." pp 88

"Israel must have the legal and territorial basis, it is argued, for military action to assure the continued demilitarization of the West Bank and Gaza. No Arab armor, artillery or missile batteries are to be deployed in any surrendered territories. There is obviously little room in this concept for an independent sovereign Palestinian state." pp 97

"A way has to be found to differentiate convincingly between a stance of firm support for Israel and a readiness to support whatever the Israeli government of the day advocates...A proposal to move the United States Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is an example of an irresponsible and foolish litmus test. Its sole impact (would be) to spread mischief and ill-feeling." pp 118-119

"The settlement budget, though small, is vulnerable in any drive to cut overall government spending and will be wound down in the coming years." pp 119

"The extended borders reached in 1967 may well hold firm for a long time to come, in the absence of effective pressures from any source to change them...Even the broader Palestinian question, for all its emotional and humanitarian force, is important to US foreign policy only because its potential for spreading a populist instability throughout a strategic quarter of the world." pp 123-24

"Another war would certainly change the equation; a significant increase in the level of violence along Israel's extended frontiers would increase the costs of prolonged occupation. Opportunities for diplomatic maneuver could arise...The United States, a would-be mediator, must be ready to move fast in response to changing circumstances, even if it is not called upon to initiate a diplomatic process. pp 124-125

And there is the CFR plan in a nutshell. To force Israel's removal from its defensive positions, a fully armed PLO state must start a war. Once the violence reaches a critical point, the US and its CFR Secretary Of State will negotiate an end to the conflict which will include the removal of all Jews from the Golan Heights, Jordan Valley, Judea, Samaria and Gaza. Give the CFR some credit, they are good to their word. And if Israelis don't wake up mighty fast to their plans, they are going to find out just what their word means. A good starting point would be for Israelis to totally boycott all members of the CFR, starting with such American Jewish leaders as Bronfman, Lauder, Hoenlin, Zuckerman, and Seigman. We are all suffering from their infiltration and it's time to say, 'enough'.

end

Notice:

Last week, The Public Committee For The Reinvestigation Of The Rabin Assassination met to discuss two issues: A slander suit against Yediot Ahronot and the building of an extended web site. The suit against Yediot, Israel's largest newspaper, is based on a six page article they published last month accusing members of the committee of "dancing on Rabin's blood" and calling them "double murderers." A law suit forcing the newspaper to prove these claims are true might well open the whole Rabin murder in a court of law. The committee members agreed that the suit was their first priority. Attorney Nitzana Darshan-Leitner explained the issues to us and suggested that I be excluded from the list of plaintiffs because I'm too easy a target.

The plaintiffs in the suit will be Professors Arieh Zaritsky and Hillel Weiss and Dr. David Chen, who is also a Lieut. General in the IDF reserves. The costs of the suit are not inconsiderable, legal fees alone will be $2000 before court costs, and the committee agreed that members with newsgroups; Arieh Zaritsky's Professors For A Strong Israel, Arieh Gallin's Root and Branch Society and my unnamed readers list will send out a request for donations. All bank transfers will be handled by the respected accountant and chairman of the committee Yaacov Verker. To donate, please transfer funds to the account of Mr. Verker: Bank Discount, Tel Ganim, Branch number 007, Account number 127566. The talented web designer Iris Mersel volunteered to take a month from her regular job just to design our site. That's how much she is willing to sacrifice for the truth.

The committee members agreed that was too much to ask. Her plan was, initially, to produce an archive of every piece of evidence in the Rabin murder case. In the end, a more modest plan was adopted. The most important documents will be presented along with explanations in English, Hebrew and Russian. Daily news updates on the Israeli situation will be presented along with the Rabin archive in order to increase traffic. If all goes as planned, the web site will reach hundreds of thousands of Israelis and turn the corner, finally, on the search for the truth behind the murder.

After that, we start on saving the nation. The main costs are Iris Mersel's work, as well as that of the translators and the site itself. One anonymous donor, a brave patriot, has sent a check to Iris for $500 to begin the project. The more that can be raised, the bigger the site that can be built. Donators are invited to support the site by transferring funds to Chamish, Bank Leumi, Modiin, Branch number 680, Account number 11782/71. All transactions will be recorded by Mr. Verker. Unless you choose to be shy and anonymous, you are requested to inform Mr. Verker of your very kind contribution by writing him at werkercpa@bezeqint.net

Well, that's the first time I ever did that!